Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Israel Actually Does Not Yet Exist!



Jim Kirwan


You would think that after all the time that has passed since Israel declared itself to be a state among the community of nations; that by now, it would be at least an accepted fact in the world. However you would not be correct. Israel is a place that has yet to finish claiming, what 'it' sees as its own border-rights; see the map above.

In the map you can see that Israel wants a piece of Turkey; more than half of Syria; more than half of Iraq; a tiny bit of Iran; nearly half of Kuwait; more than a third of Saudi-Arabia; half the Red Sea; All of Suez; a large chunk of Egypt; and All of Jordon, Palestine and Lebanon. That is what Israel is demanding from the Middle-East in exchange for "peace in the region." Instead it is Israel that must be delegitimized and censored not the rest of the world!

Fact is Israel continues to violate every tenet of national and international law; regardless of the nation that feels they have been either raped or robbed-blind by this international teen-ager that has no respect for anyone but themselves.

In fact they have recently begun a campaign to slaughter everyone-else-in-the-world that is not an authentic Israeli. This alone is enough of a reason to "cast-out" Israel from the community of nation-states. Israel cannot be allowed to act as judge, jury and executioner over the lives of every other person on this planet, simply because they come from a tribal state that is not part of the twenty-first century: And is not even made up of tribes that can communicate with each other. (1)

"Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro, who heads the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the Yitzhar settlement, wrote in his book "The King's Torah" that even babies and children can be killed if they pose a threat to the nation.

Shapiro based the majority of his teachings on passages quoted from the Bible, to which he adds his opinions and beliefs.

"It is permissible to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation," he wrote, adding: "If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder."

This 'problem' gets blamed on a few Rabbis' many of whom are revered inside that country-that-is-not a state. But in reality this 'problem' goes far beyond the border dispute that began in 1948. Because this situation has become central to the issue of when any state, anywhere, becomes an "outlaw-nation." In this case it seems that Israel has actively sought that status since the 'idea' of Israel was born.

Today it was announced that Israel will offer sanctuary to yet another War-Criminal: this one being the soon-to-be-deposed "leader" of Egypt: Hosni Mubarak. The United States has long been the haven of deposed-dictators, but even we could not stomach bringing this criminal over here. So Israel stepped up and showed the world where its real sympathies have always lain. (2)

Mubarak according to George Galloway: "That there are many governments responsible for this great crime in Palestine. But the dictatorship of Hosni Barack is jointly responsible for the murder of every Palestinian who has died these last few years when he was embracing Libney as the bombs were falling; when he locked the border of Raffia he became an international criminal, and an outlaw of the Arab world. So I call in conclusion on the great people of Egypt; on the heroic armed forces of Egypt; on the heroic army of Egypt of 1973 - to rise up and sweep away this tyrant Mubarak. To rise-up; to rise-up and to demolish the border at Raffia and LET THE PEOPLE GO FREE!" (3)


'The only way to stop this nightmare is to delegitimize Israel Embassies worldwide: They have never been a legitimate nation - ever.

It is time for the civilized world to throw out all the Israeli embassy's, and pull their own embassy's out of Israel. Israel has chosen to ignore all international and state laws of every country they have gone into; and it's way past time to withdraw all diplomatic relations-globally!

This would be the least bloody solution to the continuing crime that Zionism has been giving to the world since 1948. Taking in this war criminal is just about the last straw in international relations in the nearly permanently destabilized Middle-East and Israel ought to be punished accordingly-not just for Mubarak-but for everything they have planned using their Mossad and other death-squads around the world as well as their stated goals as seen on the map at the top of this article!'

Israel's main export today is pure violence that is cloaked as "security-services." There is nothing positive that has ever come from this brooding and vengefully paranoid "state' that could ever add anything to the human condition. It is time for Israel to be delegitimized-forever!

Source

Millions rally to oust Mubarak - Al Jazeera

What Right Do Zionist Jews Have To Palestine?

From Jason Collett

What title-deeds do the Jews of today actually have to the land of 'Israel'? The idea that a people can possess some kind of ethnic ancestral right to a territory supposedly vacated by their forebears some millenia previously, implying a right in perpetuity, can have no legal basis. Or otherwise Americans of European ancestry, to name just one group of people, will have to pack their bags.

According to Dr Alfred Lilienthal in his book The Zionist Connection, "The Jewish population of Palestine [what is now Israel and the occupied territories, the West Bank and Gaza] at the time of the Balfour Declaration in 1917 was a mere 7 percent of the 700 000 inhabitants. The rest were Muslim and Christian Arabs·At the time of the (US-dominated UN) partition vote in 1947 there were only 650 000 Jews in Palestine while there were 1,3 million indigenous Palestinian Arabs, either Christian or Muslim. Under the partition plan, 56 % of Palestine was given for a Zionist state to people who constituted 33 % of the population and owned about 6 % [six percent] of the land· These UN figures have never been in dispute·"

But there is a further issue, which also (YET AGAIN!) demonstrates the fundamentally questionable foundations of Zionism.

Jews are actually not even the modern descendents of the Israel of the Biblical Old Testament:

According to both the early-20th-Century popular historian H.G.Wells and the Hungarian-Jewish intellectual and author Arthur Koestler, amongst numerous others, the people known today as Jews are primarily the descendents of a Turkish tribe known as the Khazars. The Khazars have no historical connection to Palestine. They converted to Judaism between 620 and 740AD, and have no genetic connection to biblical Israel, and hence to the narratives of the Bible and the Holy Land. Koestler actually devoted an entire book called The Thirteenth Tribe (1976) to the fact that the Jews of eastern European origin, who are known as the Ashkenazi Jews and who make up about 95% of the Jewish population of today, are of Khazar origin. In other words - virtually all of the Jews of the modern world have no Hebrew ancestry, and no ancient connection with Palestine.

Does it matter? Does world peace matter? Do the human rights of a violently oppressed people matter? Does anything but sport and television sitcoms matter?

Arthur Koestler was by no means the first to draw attention to this particular issue. He quotes from twentieth-century works on the subject by, amongst others, Professors A.N.Poliak of Tel Aviv University, D.M.Dunlop of Columbia University in New York, and J.B.Bury of Cambridge University. The courageous Jewish anti-Zionist commentator Dr Alfred Lilienthal raised the issue fifty years ago and has continued to do so for decades. In fact, the famous H.G.Wells in the early 1920's in his popular Outline of History described the Jews as a Turkish people and stated that (to the) Jewish Khazars.. are to be ascribed the great settlements of Jews in Poland and Russia (chapt XXXII:8 ) and The main part of Jewry never was in Judea, and never came out of Judea (XXIX:1).

Lord Moyne the British secretary of state in Cairo declared on June 9, 1942, in the House of Lords that the Jews were not the descendants of the ancient Hebrews and that they had no "legitimate claim" on the Holy Land. A proponent of curtailing immigration into Palestine, he was accused of being "an implacable enemy of Hebrew independence."(Isaac Zaar, Rescue and Liberation: America's Part in the Birth of Israel, New York: Bloch, 1954, p. 115). On November 6, 1944, Lord Moyne was assassinated in Cairo by two members of the Stern Gang led by Yitzak Shamir, latter to become premier of Israel. (This assassination was not unique in the history of Zionism. In September 1948 Count Folke Bernadotte, appointed by the UN as mediator between the Zionist settlers in Palestine and the native Palestinians, was murdered on orders from the same Yitzhak Shamir. Count Bernadotte was the head of the Swedish Red Cross and had risked his life to save thousands of Jews from German concentration camps. This set a precedent and encouragement for the Zionist use of assassination as a convenient political instrument, which the US and European governments have in effect condoned since then.)

Much old documentary evidence exists on the subject of the Khazars dating from the ninth and tenth centuries and earlier - from Arab, Byzantine, Hebrew, Russian and other sources. The conversion of the Khazars to Judaism is described in the so-called 'Khazar Correspondence' dating from the tenth century between Hasdai Ibn Shaprut, the Jewish chief minister of the Caliph of Cordoba in Spain, and Joseph, the king of the Khazars. In this the king traces the ancestry of his people not to Shem, father of the Semites, but to Japheth, Noah's third son. The Book of Genesis (10:2,3) itself also describes Ashkenaz as a descendent of Japheth, rather than Shem. In other words, the Jews are not a Semitic people, but their contempt for the Arab world and their bitter and violent war of dispossession against the Palestinian Arabs could be termed anti-Semitic.

The Khazars were formerly well known as a powerful people who, at their peak, 'controlled or exacted tribute from some thirty different nations and tribes' (Koestler), and were the supreme masters of the southern half of eastern Europe for more than a century. The Caspian Sea is still known today in Arabic as Bahr-ul-Khazar, 'the Khazar Sea'. These people controlled trade on the Dnieper, the Don and Volga Rivers between the Swedish Vikings, known as the Rus (the founders of Russia) in the north, and Byzantium-Constantinople (capital of the Eastern Roman Empire), Persia and Arabia in the south. The extent of trade along these rivers is indicated by the very large number of Arab coins - approximately 50 000 found, strangely enough, in Sweden and dating from Viking times.

After their conversion to 'Judaism', a religion based primarily on the teachings of the Pharisees and the Talmud, the Khazars adopted circumcision and became known as the 'Jewish Khazars' and then later simply as 'Jews'. Before the conversion, the 'Jewish' population of the entire region was sparse; afterwards, understandably, it suddenly became large. Writing in the tenth century, the Muslim chronicler Muqaddasi says 'In Khazaria, sheep, honey and Jews exist in large quantities' (Koestler p 43).

After being defeated by the Rus around 965AD, the power of the Khazars waned, and a gradual migration commenced westwards and north-westwards into Eastern Europe - the Ukraine, Hungary, Poland and Lithuania. Koestler shows that Yiddish (the former Jewish lingua franca of eastern Europe which is classed as a German dialect) developed not in Germany but in Poland as an amalgam of German, Hebrew and Slavonic (Russian and Polish) - the strong German basis of the language being the result of the German social and cultural prominence in the main cities of Poland in medieval times (Koestler chapt VII : 3). Hebrew itself was only used for liturgical and rabbinic-scholastic purposes, not for everyday communication. No archaeological or other evidence exists of the use in biblical times of the six-pointed 'star of David', the emblem of the Ashkenazi Jews and the Israeli state, and the yarmulke, the skullcap worn by Jewish males, likewise has no biblical foundation. So neither the use of Hebrew nor the star of David, or the wearing of the yarmulke indicate any historical connection with the territory.

Koestler says: "The historical evidence.. indicates that the bulk of Eastern Jewry - and hence of world Jewry - is of Khazar-Turkish, rather than Semitic, origin."

(p 175). This of course poses various interesting questions on many issues, including that of the violent and manipulative Jewish takeover of Palestine during the last century. The reason these questions are not asked is that the story of the Khazar conversion is generally so little known. The academic, church and media establishments generally have shown no interest in correcting such an awkward and fundamental misperception, the source of so much suffering and spilt blood. They consider the issue to be unimportant or potentially dangerous in spite of the shocking human-rights outrages that the mainly Khazar-descended 'Israelis' and their Khazar-descended international Zionist supporters have perpetrated against the native people in Palestine over the last century.

Is there any doubt about the issue?

The British journalist Douglas Reed, former chief Central European correspondent of the Times, in 1950 wrote "The Eastern European Zionists are not Semites (though the Arabs are), have no semitic blood, and their remote forefathers never trod Palestinian earth."

Mr Benjamin Freedman, a Jewish industrialist born in New York, wrote in the Economic Council Letter published there of October 15 1947: "These Eastern European Jews have neither a racial nor a historic connection with Palestine. Their ancestors were not inhabitants of the Promised Land. They are the direct descendants of the people of the Khazar Kingdom.. The Khazars were a non-semitic, Turko-Mongolian tribe."

Mr Freedman was challenged, unwisely, by a Zionist objector. He invited his challenger to go with him to the Jewish room of the New York Public Library. There they could together examine the Jewish Encyclopaedia volume I pp. 1-12, and the published works of Graetz, Dubnow, Friedlander, Raisin and many other noted Jewish historians, which, as well as other non-Jewish authorities, "establish the fact beyond all possible doubt." (Somewhere South of Suez (1950) pp349-350).

If the Khazar account is untrue, we can be sure that a swift and comprehensive rebuttal would have followed Koestler's book and Lilienthal's long-standing allegations, let alone those of H.G.Wells. Can anyone name the book or books in which such a rebuttal appeared?

To confuse the Jews of today with the Hebrews of the Bible is like believing that the Cherokee 'Indians' not only follow the Hindu religion but will eventually return in triumph to the valley of the sacred Ganges.

Source

Millions of protesters rock Egypt to oust Mubarak

Egypt's anti-government protesters, scenting victory after President Hosni Mubarak agreed to discuss political reforms, rallied support for what they hope can be a million-strong march for democracy on Tuesday, reassured by the all-powerful army, which has said their demands are legitimate and that it will not fire on them.

The highways between Cairo and some Egyptian cities have been blocked by the army ahead of a scheduled massive march, Al Arabiya reporter said.

He added that the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) was preparing for a pro-Mubarak rallies in Cairo as well as in the Suez Canal governorate of Ismailia

"March of a million"

Protesters in Cairo's Tahrir Square, mostly keeping vigil through the night in defiance of a curfew, vowed to continue their campaign until the 82-year-old Mubarak quit.

They were joined by thousands of others soon after dawn, some people sweeping rubbish from the square while others shouted insults against Mubarak at the army helicopter circling overhead.

By 01.00 pm (1100 GMT) around 200,000 people had gathered for the march, and by 2:21 more than a quarter of a million Egyptians throng Midan square.

At around 3:20 pm Egyptians reached their one million protesters target in Midan square, and hours later they have over-achieved their target of "march of a million" as more than one million Egyptians thronged Midan square in central Cairo on Tuesday, and hundreds of thousands of demonstrators protested in other Egyptian cities including Alexandria, Mansoura, Kafr al-Shaikh, al-Mahala, Seuz and Bour Saeed.

People have demonstrated despite internet and mobile phones services being unavailable in the country, and train services are still stopped from working.

They announced an indefinite general strike and called for a "march of a million" in the capital on Tuesday, the eighth day of an uprising that has claimed up to 140 lives in clashes between demonstrators and police.

Another million-strong march was planned in the Mediterranean port city of Alexandria, as national train services were cancelled in an apparent bid to stymie protests.

Fifty Egyptian human rights groups, meanwhile, called on Mubarak to step down to avoid bloodshed on the eighth day of anti-government protests that have left at least 125 people dead.

"President Mubarak must respect the wishes of the Egyptian people and step down to avoid shedding the blood of Egyptians," the non-governmental organizations said in a statement issued ahead of new planned demonstrations.

The army also searched protesters before entering Midan square and handed out flyers urging protesters to keep security intact.

Mohammed ElBaradei, the Nobel peace laureate emerging as a key figure in protests in Egypt, said in a British newspaper Tuesday President Mubarak should leave "if he wants to save his skin."

"When a regime withdraws the police entirely from the streets of Cairo, when thugs are part of the secret police, trying to give the impression that without Mubarak the country will go into chaos, this is a criminal act. Somebody has to be accountable," he told The Independent.

"And now, as you can hear in the streets, people are not saying Mubarak should go, they are now saying he should be put on trial. If he wants to save his skin, he better leave," he said.

Read more...

The 'Peace Process' Exposed As A Psy-OP Fraud

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Al Jazeera Reports Mubarak’s planning exile to Tel Aviv—The Writing on the Wall

Update: Al Jazeera reports Mubarak’s planning exile to Tel Aviv. According to sources in the Egyptian Embassy in Tel Aviv, Israel is making preparations to welcome Hosni Mubarak into exile after Saudi Arabia rejected overtures. Al Jazeera also reports Israeli diplomats have fled Egypt amid the unrest. CNN reports widespread rumors that Mubarak’s wife and other family members have already fled Egypt.

Arab Executives Predict Regime Change in Egypt, as U.S. State Dept says reshuffling of government won’t do. Demonstrations across the U.S. rally in solidarity with protesters. See also Robert Fisk’s latest dispatch: Death throes of a dictatorship.

The U.S. State Dept’s statement, “We strongly believe that the Egyptian Government needs to engage immediately with the Egyptian people in implementing needed economic, political, and social reforms” appears the give-away on Saturday of Mubarak’s fragile hold on power.

Typically, when commenting on this regional baby sister of Israel’s, the U.S. State Department will congratulate Egypt on its steps toward democracy, or issue a public encouragement of a fair electoral process like it did before last November’s lower-house elections.

Explicit calls from Washington for democracy in Egypt carry with them the risk of being interpreted as a threat, a statement to the Egyptian people themselves, or a reckless jeopardizing of U.S. weapons sales to the dictatorship.

No such concerns weigh heavy in Washington now.

Before President Obama spoke yesterday, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the administration might cut the $1.5 billion in annual foreign aid sent to Egypt, contingent on Mubarak’s response to the demonstrations and the ”legitimate grievances” of the Egyptian people.

Domestically, Obama can’t be seen looking impotent—unable to shape world events in the same manner that he seems listless here against raging unemployment and the arrogance of Wall Street.

Intelligence reports coming out of Egypt paint a picture of miscalculations from the regime of Mubarak that even tanks and guns cannot offset.

The images coming out of Egypt, courtesy of Al Jazeera, are reaching Americans (banal cable commentary aside), and impressions are forming.

Sure, Americans don’t know or care that for decades Egyptian elites and various corrupt Arab autocrats have played the role of secret enforcers for the American attack dog, Israel.

But the Arab and Persian street knows this fully well, without aid of the publication of leaked documents like the Palestine Papers, though that didn’t help the autocrats’ cause.

Political Cassandras are everywhere in the region and the U.S. where disinformation and spin usually carry the day or at least the media cycle.

Read more...

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Mubarak makes moves as protests convulse Egypt

Cairo, Egypt (CNN) -- President Hosni Mubarak's efforts to redeem his 30-year-rule did little to quell Egyptian discontent Saturday as tens of thousands of demonstrators again defied a curfew to demand change and a new fear of anarchy percolated.

The world's attention fell on central Cairo where the Army was deployed to replace police forces that clashed brutally with demonstrators. But with many Cairo neighborhoods left without any security, Egyptians began to feel the sting of politics cutting into personal safety.

Shops and businesses were looted and abandoned police stations stripped clean of their arsenals.

In one area, residents set up barricades and handed out sticks and kitchen knives as defense measures. Another group of men armed themselves and planned to sit outside all night to guard their houses.

"There have been no police officers on the streets since this morning," Cairo resident Sherief Abdelbaki said. "All the men are trying to protect the ladies, their wives and children."

"We have all become vigilantes ... it's like the Wild West," he said. "Where is the security?"

After days of silence, the embattled Mubarak acted swiftly Saturday. He fired his entire cabinet, then tapped two new leaders to stand by his side.

Mubarak appointed his trusted and powerful intelligence chief, Omar Suleiman, as his deputy, the first time the authoritarian regime has seen such a post. He also asked Ahmed Shafik, the civil aviation minister in the cabinet that just stepped down, to form a new government, state-run Nile TV reported. Shafik is a former Air Force officer with strong military connections.

But Egyptians fed up with with what they see as Mubarak's hollow promises for reform were hardly appeased. In a fifth day of protests engulfing the Arab world's most populous nation, people took to the streets, chanting "Down with Mubarak" and burning pictures of the authoritarian leader.

"There is very little in terms of real power that the president still has," CNN's Ben Wedeman said from Cairo. "The army is controlling the street, but politically there is a complete vacuum."

Opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei, who returned home to Cairo to join the demonstrations and was placed under house arrest on Friday, said Saturday that he was disappointed in Mubarak's decision to stay put.

Read more...

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Mossad ran 9/11 Arab "hijacker" terrorist operation

By Wayne Madsen

British intelligence reported in February 2002 that the Israeli Mossad ran the Arab hijacker cells that were later blamed by the U.S. government's 9/11 Commission for carrying out the aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. WMR has received details of the British intelligence report which was suppressed by the government of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair.

A Mossad unit consisting of six Egyptian- and Yemeni-born Jews infiltrated "Al Qaeda" cells in Hamburg (the Atta-Mamoun Darkanzali cell), south Florida, and Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates in the months before 9/11. The Mossad not only infiltrated cells but began to run them and give them specific orders that would eventually culminate in their being on board four regularly-scheduled flights originating in Boston, Washington Dulles, and Newark, New Jersey on 9/11.

The Mossad infiltration team comprised six Israelis, comprising two cells of three agents, who all received special training at a Mossad base in the Negev Desert in their future control and handling of the "Al Qaeda" cells. One Mossad cell traveled to Amsterdam where they submitted to the operational control of the Mossad's Europe Station, which operates from the El Al complex at Schiphol International Airport. The three-man Mossad unit then traveled to Hamburg where it made contact with Mohammed Atta, who believed they were sent by Osama Bin Laden. In fact, they were sent by Ephraim Halevy, the chief of Mossad.

The second three-man Mossad team flew to New York and then to southern Florida where they began to direct the "Al Qaeda" cells operating from Hollywood, Miami, Vero Beach, Delray Beach, and West Palm Beach. Israeli "art students," already under investigation by the Drug Enforcement Administration for casing the offices and homes of federal law enforcement officers, had been living among and conducting surveillance of the activities, including flight school training, of the future Arab "hijacker" cells, particularly in Hollywood and Vero Beach.

In August 2001, the first Mossad team flew with Atta and other Hamburg "Al Qaeda" members to Boston. Logan International Airport's security was contracted to Huntleigh USA, a firm owned by an Israeli airport security firm closely connected to Mossad — International Consultants on Targeted Security – ICTS. ICTS's owners were politically connected to the Likud Party, particularly the Netanyahu faction and then-Jerusalem mayor and future Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. It was Olmert who personally interceded with New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani to have released from prison five Urban Moving Systems employees, identified by the CIA and FBI agents as Mossad agents. The Israelis were the only suspects arrested anywhere in the United States on 9/11 who were thought to have been involved in the 9/11 attacks.

The two Mossad teams sent regular coded reports on the progress of the 9/11 operation to Tel Aviv via the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. WMR has learned from a Pentagon source that leading Americans tied to the media effort to pin 9/11 on Arab hijackers, Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban were present in the Israeli embassy on September 10, 2001, to coordinate their media blitz for the subsequent days and weeks following the attacks. It is more than likely that FBI counter-intelligence agents who conduct surveillance of the Israeli embassy have proof on the presence of the Americans present at the embassy on September 10. Some of the Americans are well-known to U.S. cable news television audiences.

In mid-August, the Mossad team running the Hamburg cell in Boston reported to Tel Aviv that the final plans for 9/11 were set. The Florida-based Mossad cell reported that the documented "presence" of the Arab cell members at Florida flight schools had been established.

The two Mossad cells studiously avoided any mention of the World Trade Center or targets in Washington, DC in their coded messages to Tel Aviv. Halevy covered his tracks by reporting to the CIA of a "general threat" by an attack by Arab terrorists on a nuclear plant somewhere on the East Coast of the United States. CIA director George Tenet dismissed the Halevy warning as "too non-specific." The FBI, under soon-to-be-departed director Louis Freeh, received the "non-specific" warning about an attack on a nuclear power plant and sent out the information in its routine bulletins to field agents but no high alert was ordered.

The lack of a paper trail pointing to "Al Qaeda" as the masterminds on 9/11, which could then be linked to Al Qaeda's Mossad handlers, threw off the FBI. On April 19, 2002, FBI director Robert Mueller, in a speech to San Francisco's Commonwealth Club, stated: "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper — either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere — that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot."

Read more...