Saturday, September 25, 2010

The Elite and Chosen People Laughing Business Game.

Dog Poet Transmitting.......

Yes… they are revving their engines. A plane from Canada was diverted to Sweden, which coincidentally just had some changes in policy not favorable to The Self Chosen Official Olympic Games Victims and it was on its way to Pakistan. This happened because a woman called on a payphone to say that there was a man on board who ‘might’ be carrying explosives. I guess this means that anyone can, at any time, call the police and say someone is on a plane with explosives and get the plane brought down and have a large news flash in the main stream fecalatorium press. (insert- now it says they let him go) Details are unimportant. Reality is unimportant. Perception is important and off we go.

We should have a pool with a prize to predict the next Israeli false flag because it really can’t be that far off now. I’m going to pick this very Monday. If I’m right I suppose everyone is going to want to know how I knew and… if I’m wrong, I get to pick again. Somebody is going to win something. You can have your choice of Atlanta or Seattle. Wait a minute. You can pick whichever you like. The odds are it won’t be in Mozambique.

You can be sure they have all kinds of side bets going, accompanied by hysterical laughter at how stupid everyone else is. It will be just like all those put options on 9/11 that got traced to Israel and immediately diverted (just like this plane) to another subject.

It’s bad enough that they do these things but they also think it’s funny. It occurs to me that some of us know more about what’s going on than they do. Some of us know it’s not funny what they do. Some of us know that they are going to get their butts kicked soon but they don’t. They actually think they are going to come out on top.

It makes you wonder. If they are in control of so much and so confident, why do they pause and hesitate? If it is at the point where they can laugh in public and do outrageous things for their own amusement, why should they be concerned about opposition? These are the kinds of thing that occupy my mind on occasion.

I’m beginning to see that I have been wrong about a few cardinal issues. It was my assumption, or maybe it’s the general assumption (grin) that the wise guys in The Elite and Chosen People Business know all about everything. Lately I am coming to think that they are in a dream just like the people they have been selling their dreams to, so that they can put them to sleep and then kill them or do whatever else it is that they want to do.

All day, this guy on a plane has also been on the front page of, along with a no credentials starlet and what looks like a used car lot but is actually a bunch of shot up vehicles from the Mexico drug war and we are being encouraged to have compassion for cars. They are laughing at you. They think you are a joke and nothing more than sport. Basically they are saying they can do anything they want to you and laugh at you and get you to laugh along with them. Isn’t that cool?


The State And Local Bases Of Zionist Power In America

By James Petras


Any serious effort to understand the extraordinary influence of the Zionist power configuration over US foreign policy must examine the presence of key operatives in strategic positions in the government and the activities of local Zionist organizations affiliated with mainstream Jewish organizations and religious orders.

There are at least 52 major American Jewish organizations actively engaged in promoting Israel's foreign policy, economic and technological agenda in the US (see the appendix). The grassroots membership ranges from several hundred thousand militants in the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) to one hundred thousand wealthy contributors, activists and power brokers in the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In addition scores of propaganda mills, dubbed think tanks, have been established by million dollar grants from billionaire Zionists including the Brookings Institute (Haim Saban) and the Hudson Institute among others.

Scores of Zionist funded political action committees (PAC) have intervened in all national and regional elections, controlling nominations and influencing election outcomes. Publishing houses, including university presses have been literally taken over by Zionist zealots, the most egregious example being Yale University, which publishes the most unbalanced tracts parroting Zionist parodies of Jewish history (Financial Times book review section August 28/29 2010). New heavily funded Zionist projects designed to capture young Jews and turn them into instruments of Israeli foreign policy includes "Taglit-Birthright" which has spent over $250 million dollars over the past decade sending over a quarter-million Jews (between 18-26) to Israel for 10 days of intense brainwashing (Boston Globe August 26, 2010). Jewish billionaires and the Israeli state foot the bill. The students are subject to a heavy dose of Israeli style militarism as they are accompanied by Israeli soldiers as part of their indoctrination; at no point do they visit the West Bank, Gaza or East Jerusalem (Boston Globe August 26, 2010). They are urged to become dual citizens and even encouraged to serve in the Israeli armed forces.

In summary the 52 member organizations of the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations which we discuss are only the tip of the iceberg of the Zionist Power Configuration: taken together with the PACs, the propaganda mills, the commercial and University presses and mass media we have a matrix of power for understanding the tremendous influence they have on US foreign and domestic policy as it affects Israel and US Zionism.

While all their activity is dedicated first and foremost in ensuring that US Middle East policy serves Israel's colonial expansion in Palestine and war aims in the Middle East, what B'nai B'rth euphemistically calls a "focus on Israel and its place in the world", many groups 'specialize' in different spheres of activity. For example, the "Friends of the Israel Defense Force" is primarily concerned in their own words "to look after the IDF", in other words provide financial resources and promote US volunteers for a foreign army (an illegal activity except when it involves Israel). Hillel is the student arm of the Zionist power configuration claiming a presence in 500 colleges and universities, all affiliates defending each and every human rights abuse of the Israeli state and organizing all expenses paid junkets for Jewish student recruits to travel to Israel where they are heavily propagandized and encouraged to 'migrate' or become 'dual citizens'.

Method: Studying Zionist Power

There are several approaches for measuring the power of the combined Zionist organizations and influential occupants of strategic positions in government and the economy. These include (a) reputational approach (b) self claims (c) decision-making analysis (d) structural inferences. Most of these approaches provide some clues about Zionist potential power. For example, newspaper pundits and journalists frequently rely on Washington insiders, congressional staff and notables to conclude that AIPAC has the reputation for being one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington. This approach points to the need to empirically examine the operations of AIPAC in influencing Congressional votes, nomination of candidates, defeating incumbents who do not unconditionally support the Israeli line. In other words analyzing the Congressional and Executive decision- making process is one key to measuring Zionist power. But it is not the only one. Zionist power is a product of a historical context, where media ownership and wealth concentration and other institutional levers of power come into play and shape the current decision-making framework. Cumulative power over time and across institutions creates a heavy bias in the political outcomes favorable to Israel's organized agents in America. Once again the mere presence of Jews or Zionists in positions of economic, cultural and political power does not tell us how they will use their resources and whether they will have the desired effect. Structural analysis, the location of Zionists in the class structure, is necessary but not sufficient for understanding Zionist power. One has to proceed and analyze the content of decisions made and not made regarding the agenda of Israel's backers operating in the USA. The 52 major Zionists organizations are very open about their claims to power, their pursuit of Israel's agenda and their subservience to each and every Israeli regime.

Those who deny Zionist power over US Mid East foreign policy are left-Zionists namely Noam Chomsky and his acolytes. They never analyze the legislative process, executive decision-making, the structures and activity of the million member Zionist grassroots and the appointments and background of key policy makers deciding strategic policies in the Middle East. Instead they resort to superficial generalizations and political demagogy, imputing policy to "Big Oil" and the "military-industrial complex" or "US imperialism". Categories devoid of empirical content and historical context about real existing policy making regarding the Middle East.

The Making of Zionist Power in the US Government

To understand US submission to Israeli war policies in the Middle East one has to look beyond the role of lobbies pressuring Congress and the role of political action committees and wealthy Zionist campaign contributions. A much neglected but absolutely essential building block of Zionist power over US foreign economic, diplomatic and military policy is the Zionist presence in key policy positions, including the Departments of Treasury and State, the Pentagon, the National Security Council and the White House.

Operating within the top policymaking positions, Zionist officials have consistently pursued policies in line with Israel's militarist policies, aimed at undermining and eliminating any country critical of the Jewish States' colonial occupation of Palestine, its regional nuclear monopoly, its expansion of Jews only settlements and above all its strident efforts to remain the dominant power in the Arab East. The Zionist policymakers in Government are in constant consultation with the Israeli state, ensuring coordination with the Israeli military (IDF) command, its Foreign Office and secret police (MOSSAD) and compliance with the Jewish State's political line. Over the past 24 months not a single Zionist policymaker has voiced any criticism of Israel's most heinous crimes, ranging from the savaging of Gaza to the massacre of the humanitarian flotilla and the expansion of new settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank. A record of loyalty to a foreign power which even exceeds the subservience of the Stalinist and Nazi fellow travelers in Washington during the 1930s and 1940s.

Zionist policymakers in strategic positions depend on the political backing and work closely with their counterparts in the "lobbies" (AIPAC) in Congress and in the national and local Jewish Zionist organizations. Many of the leading Zionist policymakers rose to power through a deliberate strategy of infiltrating the government to shape policy promoting Israel's interest over and above the interests of the US populace. While a degree of cohesion resulting from a common allegiance to Tel Aviv can account for suspected nepotism and selection, it is also the case that the powerful Jewish lobbies can play a role in creating key positions in Government and ensuring that one of their own will occupy that position and pursue Israel's agenda.



Veterans Today

Nobody in his right mind, nobody with the least critical thinking could possibly buy into the 9/11 official story of the reason why the world trade center towers collapsed – at free fall speed- like a house of cards into their basements in just few seconds- WTC building 7 collapsed in exactly 6.5 seconds. Something only very precise demolition can accomplish, something which takes days if not weeks to prepare.

Whoever planned the 9/11 operation and whoever managed to fool the masses of terrorized people and tricked them into believing that al Qa`ida and its members of Afghanistan cave dwellers pulled this thing off did not consider that scientists and trained specialists would be the ones to finally expose the conspiracy and unravel 9/11 mystery.

In a previous post by the title “Danish scientist breaks the 9/11 culture of silence” We explained why professor Neil Harrits– a Danish professor of chemistry- believed the two airplanes- impacts did not cause the towers to collapse. And according to a newly published scientific article, researchers found Nano-Thermite explosive in the rubble of WTC collapsed buildings that couldn’t have come from the planes. They believe large amounts of explosives were placed in the buildings in advance.

Niels Harrit and eight other researchers conclude in this article that it was Nano-Thermite that caused these buildings to collapse.


William Cooper's Mystery Babylon: Part 28 – Lucifer 2000

Transcribed by wakingup72 @


Across America and around the world, you're listening once again to the Hour of the Time. I'm your host, William Cooper.

(audio playback begins)

[Dwayne Walker (DW)]: Is there a group of men and women out there who are secretly controlling our finances, our media communications and every aspects of our lives? Well, my two guests think that they very well might be. Uh, we have Jordan Maxwell, who has made an appearance in Ancient Mysteries of the Bible on CBS with William Devane hosting it, and he's agreed to come back and do the sequel, and we have Anthony J. Hilder, of Radio Free World. Uh, Jordan Maxwell's name, there's a quote that I'd like to bring to your attention and I'd like to start off with, uh, Jordan answering this. "It is probable that most of the public figures and military men involved in the secret scheme are unaware of the real goals or who is really behind it." Jordan, I gotta ask, what's...what's going on here?

[Jordan Maxwell (JM)]: (laughs) Well let's, let's start with a term that we're hearing quite a bit about in the last couple of years: The New World Order. Our president is going all around the world proclaiming a New World Order. Incidentally, all the presidents, living presidents, along with many of the heads of states throughout the world are going to meet, according to the L.A. Times, are going to meet in the year 2000 at the pyramid in Egypt to bring in what is called the New World Order. There is something going on here on an international worldwide scale right before our eyes, but that so many of us are unaware and, consequently, we're not really seeing what is happening. There is, in fact, a conspiracy or a planned world domination coming by this thing that George Bush calls, a "New World Order." On the back of the one dollar bill, there are a lot of important occult symbolism on the back of the one dollar bill [sic]. On the left-hand side, you'll see the pyramid, and the pyramid of Egypt. It's an Egyptian pyramid on an American dollar bill. The significance is very important. Above the pyramid, you will see the words, Annuit Cœptis, which basically means in Latin, "Our enterprise is a success," or "Our project has been crowned with success." And the project, which is the success, is on the banner beneath the pyramid: Novus Ordo Seclorum, being Latin for "New Order of the World," or the "New World Order." On the bottom of the pyramid you will see the Roman numerals for 1776. This exact, identical emblem of the pyramid within the circle, the Novus Ordo Seclorum, it was not original in America [sic]. It was first found on writings that are today in museums in Europe in the year 1774, 1775, by a man named Adam Weishoff, who founded the Bavarian Order of the Illuminati, a secret society of Freemasons operating in Europe that had designs on the entire world to bring about what they called a New World Order. So that emblem on the back of the dollar bill, on the left-hand side, with the pyramid is not an American symbol. It is a very old symbol coming from...

[Anthony Hilder (AH)]: Jordan, you should bring up the fact that this is the Order of the Illuminati...

[JM]: Yes.

[AH]: ...and the May 1st, 1776 did not signify the creation of the United States of America...

[JM]: No, no.

[AH]: ...but the Order of the Illuminati, or the Enlightened Ones, or the Luciferians.

[JM]: Yes.

[AH]: And this is a Satanic symbol. It is on the cover of the Illuminati documents from May 1st, 1776, which obviously precedes the birth of this nation on July 4th, 1776. On the very top of the pyramid, there is the Apu, the all-seeing eye, which was the name of the Soviet secret police during the Stalin era.

[DW]: Alright, now Anthony, you've done, you've spent most of your life studying these secret societies and the Illuminati and you, uh, put out a record sometime ago, called the Illuminati CFR...

[AH]: CFR, Council on Foreign Relations, right.

[DW]: Right. This is, you know, I've heard various charlatans coming out talking about the Illuminati, but I was wondering if you could get into a little more detail about the history of this organization and some of the more -- uh, you were talking about, uh, the eagle, for instance, and the pyramids, that sort of thing...and talk a little bit more about the Freemason origins of the Illuminati.

[JM]: Well, let me just make this one comment first, and then Anthony can go on with it. The -- at the top of the pyramid, you'll see the little triangle with the eye in it, the eye was the eye of Horus. Horus was the eye of God, the sun. And so, the sun represented the pupil, or the eye of God in the ancient Egyptian philosophy, and that's why you'll see the light emanating from around the eye. So, it's the worship of light, Luciferianism is the worship of coming forth of light into the world and, therefore, our masters, these manipulating masters behind the scenes of world government, who are manipulating all peoples, uh, consider themselves to be enlightened, enlightened despots, enlightened people. And, of course, when you go to university [sic], you graduate from a university, you wear the Masonic square of Freemasonry on your head to symbolize that you are an alumni. Alumni comes from the word, "illumini," [sp?] you have been illuminated into the enlightened power structure of the New World Order. That's the actual basis for these symbols, and to go on with the rest of the symbolism...

[AH]: Well, I think it's important to bring up the fact that George Bush did not write the New World Order. In fact, if you want to know who wrote the New World Order, you simply go back to Adolf Hitler. It wasn't his first book, that was Mein Kampf. The second book, The New World Order. And Rudolph Hess went out and said, in introduction of Hitler, he said, "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer." One world, one race, one ruler. That's what this whole United Nations is all about. I'm for a free world that's in total opposition to the New World Order.

[DW]: Well, Bush's New World Order may have come from Adolf Hitler, but Bill Clinton's new covenant really comes from the Old Testament.

[JM]: Alright, the "new covenant," that is a catchphrase, that is a term which has been used for, uh, at least five hundred years by a secret society of Freemasons in Europe called the British Israel World Federation. British Israel World Federation, you can see, uh, topics in movies based on this subject like, there's a motion picture that just came out, called The Handmaiden's Pail, based on British Israel philosophy for America. A secret society of Freemasons promoting something that is called as far back as five hundred years ago, "British Israel philosophy," "Anglo-Israel philosophy," which is tying in the Old Testament governmental system to be the basis for a New World Order in the coming future. And that's why, uh, this symbol is...

[DW]: Well, Clinton went to Oxford...

[JM]: Yeah.

[DW]: ...and [you would have to be] a Rhodes scholar.

[JM]: Right. The Rhodes Scholarship Foundation, and this whole thing of a "new covenant" comes directly from British Israel Freemasonry. Rhodes scholar, the Rhodes scholarship of England. So, we can get into that, it gets -- we can get into all of these. There's a significance of the Democratic party, uh, his term of the covenant, the "new covenant."

[AH]: And Cecil Rhodes is the founder of Rhodesia, that's where Rhodesia got its name. And we had a little thing called the Round Table, and...some of these Luciferian groups, and I say Luciferian, I mean it, like George Bush is a member of the Skull and Bones. Now, in the Skull and Bones fraternity -- this is a fraternity, a Faustian financial fraternity that started up in Yale University in 1832, came over here as a bounce off the Jacobin Society, who was involved in the French Revolution in the reign of terror. At Yale University, they have a structure, and you can go there, anybody can go there and see this structure they call a tomb. Inside the tomb they have, uh, their initiation and the fellas, they lay down in a coffin, and George Bush was one of them. They laid down in a coffin, nude, and they're born again in to this Satanic order. It's the ritual, it's been there. William Buckley, Jr., the Herrimans, yeah...conservatives, no. George Bush isn't a conservative...

[JM]: Never have...

[AH]: ...Ronald Reagan was never a conservative. In fact, uh, Ronald Reagan is so far left, let me -- can I say this? -- Ronald Reagan is not a conservative. He never was a conservative, he is not a conservative, he never will be a conservative. In the early days they used to call him, "Red Ronnie." It's as simple as that. (laughs) He was in the United World Federalists for thirteen years. He was in the L.A. Committee for a Democratic far-eastern policy, which was associated with the Institute of Pacific Relations, which was listed as an instrument of the Soviet Union. This guy is so far-left, he makes Fidel Castro look like a member of the John Burke's Society. All you've ever heard about Ronald Reagan was simply rhetoric. We have a one-party system controlled by this oligarchy.

[DW]: Alright, that's George Bush, that's, uh, the Skull and Bones society and I -- OK, I guess I can see this -- but Bill Clinton, though, um...he was not a member of the Skull and Bones society.

[AH]: No, I believe you – is Bill Clinton a member of the Council of Foreign Relations?

[JM]: Oh yes, he certainly is, the CFR...

[AH]: And is George Bush a member of the Council of Foreign Relations?

[JM]: Yeah, of course, I...

[DW]: Bill Clinton wasn't lying naked in a coffin trying to get born again...

[AH]: No, no, no, that -- but let me go back to an election, 1980. We had Jimmy Carter from the Trilateral Commission, we had George Bush from the Trilateral Commission, and John Anderson from the Trilateral Commission as the Independent ticket. So, it wouldn't make any difference which way the coined flipped: heads they win, tails we lose. Or tails we win, heads they...

[JM]: The Rockefellers never lost an election in the last sixty years.

[AH]: Well, no, we lose, even if the coin landed on its side. They had all bases covered.

[DW]: Aren't you -- you know, you mentioned the Trilateral Commission, and you mentioned the Rockefeller's. I've heard many fringe groups, ranging from the fundamentalists up to the neo-Nazis or whatever, taking bits and pieces of this thing and constructing it to their own agenda. Aren't you worried about being misinterpreted, and...

[AH]: They all have their own spin...

[JM]: Everybody has their own spin on it, right. Their own agenda, but what we're talking about is things that can be proven from accepted referenced works, and how you use that information to promote your own philosophy, your own agenda is -- that's their problem.

[DW]: And there is -- you're saying there is proof that, from May 1st, 1776, that the organization, the Illuminati can...

[JM]: Oh yes, you can look that up...

[DW]: ...and to this very day, the Illuminati is still around ..[inaudible]

[JM]: Of course.

[AH]: ...the cover of their document is the left-hand side, the reversal of the dollar bill. It was put on there early on, but it was the reverse Seal early on. But it. wasn't until the corncob mystic, vice-President George, uh -- no, not George Wallace, but Henry Wallace...

[JM]: Henry C. Wallace.

[AH]: ...who talked to Roosevelt and said, "Hey, this thing has got to go on there." Now, he had in the White House a little shrine for Madame [Helena P.] Blavatsky. I mean, Blavatsky wrote, uh...

[JM]: Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine.

[AH]: Yeah, but she had a manifesto going. She also had a publication of a book -- uh, well, I've seen the book. It's the combined works of Lucifer. She had Lucifer Magazine, and I've held those copies of Lucifer in my hand...leather-bound. Uh, she was the, uh, publisher and co-editor with Annie Basant, and from this Lucifer organization came theosophy, and there's only -- and from theosophy came unity, came, what is, uh...

[JM]: Yes, the other...

[AH]: This one-world religion, philosophy...and if you go the United Nations, they've got a meditation room and you'll find out that the high religion is the only one that is accepted in the United Nations. And in the mediation room, you're going to find a little Illuminati pyramid. So, they -- it's loaded with symbology and Jordan Maxwell is the expert on it...

[JM]: ...and what I was going to say, too, was that the United Nations uses a particular publishing firm for all of their documents [in public] and books and materials,and its called Lucis Publishing. [And] the United Nations uses Lucis Publishing. Lucis Publishing was at one time Helena Blavatsky's Lucifer Publishing. So, uh, to date...

[AH]: Funded by the Lucifer Trust.

[JM]: The Lucifer Trust, the United Nations, that's why it's in New York, because New York is referred to as, "The Empire State," because it's the new state of the new empire that is coming. That's why Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, with their Indiana Jones and The Empire Strikes Back, it has to do with occultism, it has to do with numerology, it has to do with a lot of mysticism coming out of theosophy. Uh, the point being is that we are involved in some very powerful occult, uh, manipulation of the world by some very astute occultists. And we are not even beginning to be aware of how far gone we are...

[AH]: And it's crazy to have a united world government. I don't want to do away with our individuality. Some people are white, some people are black, tall, short, fat, thin, Muslims, Buddhists, Christians, Jews. I like the diversity. I don't want to see a world with two hundred and twenty nations, I want to see a world with maybe three thousand nations. I believe in the right to integrate, to segregate, to separate, to have linguistic tribal nation states emerge where there are these people. Like in Africa -- and I've lived there for a while -- where the Matabeles have been fighting the Mashonas. Let them have their own nation states. Let that division take place. Let there be a free world alliance. Let there be a Croatia, let there be a Serbia. Let all individuals separate and find a place that is comfortable. Let them do their own thing in their own time in their own way. If somebody wants to be a racist, let them be a racist. Let them have a racist state. Let Israel exist; it is a religious state. It has a racist philosophy, fine. But let there be a Palestine, let there be an independent Gaza. I would like to see the secession of Alaska. I worked there in Radio Free America for three-and-a-half years. I called for the independence of Alaska. It should be an independent nation.

[DW]: Well, you know, when you -- you're mentioning all this conspiracy stuff. Now, I'm thinking that, you know, when various things happen like when the [L.A.] riots happened, um, about six months ago.

[AH]: April 29th and May 1st [sic]...

[DW]: Right, but when it happened and when just about everything bad in our society has happened, not just the riots -- I mean, it's almost tempting to want to believe that there are people behind there pulling the strings and all that, because it causes the false sense of security that, if we can just stop these people, we can have a better life, and that sort of thing...

[AH]: But we can have a better life if we stop these people...

[DW]: You don't think there's people today -- people just making mistakes, and that maybe you're just reading thing -- these things...

[AH]: How can everything happen just accidentally? I mean, uh, everything goes wrong and it happens to go wrong every time, everywhere, and we've been getting worse off and worse off and worse off. Ronald Reagan and George Bush, who are supposed to be conservatives, quote conservatives, tripled the national debt. I mean, all of the, the debt that was acquired from George Washington through Jimmy Carter, they tripled the national debt and then reporters get out there and say, "Hey, I'm thinking that these guys are conservative." They're not conservative.

[DW]: But can't you just write it up to a bad economic plan instead of saying there are people behind this (inaudible)...

[AH]: By design...

[JM]: Let me explain something to you...

[AH]: ...not a bad economic plan!

[JM]: do not get to the President of the United States and you do not have hundreds of advisors, highly educated proficient advisors in every field of human activity and human endeavor, getting C2 reports every day from the CIA, you getting [sic] USIA, DIA documentation every hour on the hour for the economy of the world, all things happening in the earth being directed to the President's table. You don't make mistakes when you have become President. You have the finest minds in the world working for you, the finest intellects that the western world can produce. That's why you - that's why in a dog-eat-dog world, our country is the most powerful economic society on earth, because we are a very powerfully intellectual society. We don't make mistakes.

[AH]: Well, Roosevelt put this way: In politics, in politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens...

[JM]: It was meant to be.

[AH]: was planned that way.

[JM]: Right.

[DW]: So they planned on George Bush and Dan Quayle?

[JM]: Oh yeah.

[AH]: Oh yeah!

[DW]: (inaudible) George Bush and Dan Quayle are some of our most intelligent people working for -

[AH]: Oh, hell no, they're not the most intelligent people!

[JM]: (laughs) No, no...they are...

[AH]: ...but they are conspiratorial.

[JM]: They're fakes.

[AH]: When you get somebody from the Skull and Bones and the Trilateral Commission, and the guy who says, uh, everything I am today I owe to David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission. Why is it that we don't, uh, talk about this organization? If they were members of the Nazi party, if they were members of the Boy Scouts, or, uh, some drag queen over in West Hollywood, we would be talking about them! There would be front-page headlines, but the Trilateral Commission, seventy-eight, ninety [sic] people who controls all three candidates for the President of the United States in 1980?

[JM]: We, we have a, we have a, we, we like to say in this country that we have the ability as Americans to elect, but the problem is we do not have to ability to SEE-lect. We can only E-lect, which means that we can only vote for those candidates which were put before us by our masters, our hidden masters behind the scenes. And when you understand that the Democratic and the Republican party are financed, and believe me, in this world, money is the bottom line, if you have it or you don't [sic]. And the Democratic and the, uh, Republican party are financed and organized and directed by the same banking families: the same people who finance your banks are the same people who finance your institutions of government. Uh, as a matter of fact, the word for "bench," in relationship to a judge sitting on the bench, comes from "bankol(sp?)," which is in Latin, meaning "the bank." The judge sits on the bench, which is a Latin word for "the bank." He officiates for the system. So when you go into the court, you're sitting before a court of order, which is actually being financed by government. So what we're talking about here is the system...

[AH]: How many people -- yeah, how many people today know that the Federal Reserve is not federal...

[JM]: It has nothing to do with the [inaudible]...

[AH]: is not a reserve...

[JM]: No.

[AH]: They create that fiat funny money that you use. It's judt like Monopoly money. For less than a penny a note, they lend it to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for interest-bearing bonds. They print this stuff for less than a penny a note, they lend it in exchange for interest-bearing bonds, they issue this into circulation as debt-bearing currency. We cannot exist as a free and independent nation when this evilarchy controls the strings. We have to abolish the privately-owned Federal Reserve system.

[JM]: And that's why, on the dollar bill, it says up in the left-hand corner, uh, on the dollar bill, "tis note is legal tender for all debts, public and private." The reason it was put on there is because it was a piece of paper, and you have to tell the people that it's legal. You don't have to tell anyone.

[AH]: It used to say, "and is redeemable and lawful money..."

[JM]: Yes.

[AH]: lawful - redeemable and lawful money. That meant it wasn't - it's not lawful money. It's not a dollar. If you have a piece of toilet paper, it can be used and tossed away, but as soon as you print, "Federal Reserve note," it becomes an obligation of the public to pay.

[JM]: So, what we're saying is that the Federal Reserve system has nothing whatsoever to do with the federal government. Just like "Federal Vacuum Cleaners" and "Federated Department Stores" has [sic] nothing to do with - it's a word, it is a play on words. A Federal Reserve system is a private banking institution, with most of its holders, um, ....

[AH]: The Class A stockholders have never been revealed to the United States public. It's never been in audit [sic].

[JM]: Never been in audit...

[AH]: ...independent audit.

[DW]: This organization, OK, that you say is pulling strings here, um, who - how many people are controlling this? Is this at the helm of one man, or is this...

[JM]: Oh no...

[AH]: It's an oligarchy...I call it an "evilarchy," because they want to bring about a Luciferian New World Order.

[DW]: And by Luciferian, uh...

[JM]: We're talking about...

[DW]: you mean...

[AH]: I'm talking about a Satanic, a Satanic order. Now, if you take a look at the layout of Washington, D.C., and Jordan Maxwell is the expert on this...

[JM]: Yeah, I've got...

[AH]: You will find out that the entire city was laid out in, uh, in symbols, uh, if you take a look at the obelisk and the Illuminati pyramid at the top of the, uh...

[JM]: Yes, as a matter of fact, the two, the two main...

[AH]: ...Washington Monument.

[JM]: ...streets going toward the Capitol building, if you take - which I have pictures over the city looking down on Washington, D.C., you'll see there are two main boulevards, uh, culminating in a pyramid, and just at the very top of the pyramid is a street cutting it off, and then within the triangle at the top, where the eye on the dollar bill is, is the Capitol. And the Capitol Building sits there - it's a pyramid, then it has the, uh, Cleopatra's needle, which is the Washington Monument, and the, and the river - the long river way, the long water way is called the river Styx, which is where Pharaoh went into Heaven, on the river Styx. It is all laid out in Masonic symbolism and the five-pointed star, which is the pentagram, has always been used, Satan worship, Satanic worship the five-pointed pentagram. And if you take the arms off of the pentagram, you have a pentagon, and the United States Pentagon is sitting exactly due north, aiming due north at the North Star, Thuban, which is drawing power, according to the ancient Egyptians, for the god of war.

[AH]: It's the same pentagram on...

[JM]: All of the Satanic symbols.

[AH]: ... the Night Stalker's hand, and you know it is Satanic ritual killings.

[DW]: Right, now I'm trying to get an angle, I'm trying to get an angle, though, on what exactly you mean by Satanism. Are you referring - or Satanic - do you mean the elevation of human reason, or do - the, uh, strong survive - or do you mean a group of people who are actually worshiping a bonafide, spiritual, uh...

[AH]: We're talking about the warlocks of Washington, here. We're talking about people who have Satanic rituals. We're talking about people who believe in a Lucifer 2000. We're talking about, uh, the creation of a New World Order in a millennium, when George Bush talks about a thousand points of light. What do you think he's talking about, a thousand points of light? Could it be a thousand-year millennium under Lucifer? What do you think, Jordan?

[JM]: Yes, there's no doubt in my mind at all; the terminology is the same. When you go back through the speeches that Adolf Hitler made, and the top Nazi speech writers, and then listen to what Ronald Reagan had to say, and George Bush, and now our new incoming president...

[AH]: Well, Hilter talked about a thousand points of, uh - he's talked about a thousand-year Reich, and Bush is talking about a thousand points of light. And, you - I don't think it's just a coincidence...

[JM]: And not points of light...

[AH]: ...and after Hitler's second book is...

[DW]: ...not points of light?

[JM]: And he - his term, Bush is...

[AH]: New World Order and a religious new order...

[JM]: ...talking about thousand points of light, thousand points of light. Light is very important to Luciferians. It has to do with Lucifer, and it has to do with Satanic societies, and what, what we're saying here is that the government of the United States is in the hands of some very powerful, sinister people who are manipulating not only us, but the rest of the world.

[AH]: If you can take a look at - just take a road map of Washington, D.C. Just take a look at it from the air, and you'll see what appears to be the Goat of Mendes, and the Goat of Mendes...

[JM]: Which is a symbol in Freemasonry. It's a symbol, it's a demonic symbol within the (inaudible)

[AH]: see the goat and the horns and the whole thing. The whole city is laid out like that. It's all over.

[JM]: So, what we're basically saying here is that there is nothing happening by chance. Uh, as I brought out before, the George Lucas and Steven Spielberg, with their Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, and the last Crusade is for the Holy Grail, the cup of Christ. It's not by chance that we have movies like that, because they're in - why is Adolf Hitler always involved with Indiana Jones? Uh, the last Crusade you can't understand unless you understand the first Crusade. The first Crusade was, was developed by what we call the Knights Templars Masonic Lodge. The Knight Templars are the ones that gave us what we call the Columbian faction of the Illuminati, which comes to America and founds itself in the state of New York, which comes from the old York Rite in England, from the Duke of York to Old York, England, to New York, the Empire State. Then, if you understand that, uh, Europe was dominating - Europe has dominated the world for almost sixteen hundred years, and we refer to Europe as the Old World. Therefore, the power structure of Europe is the Old World Order, that's the power structure of the Old World.

[DW]: We're going to be doing more of this.

(brief instrumental music)

(audio playback stops)

[William Cooper]: Well, folks, it's time to take our break. Don't go away, we'll be right back after this very short pause.

Well, folks, you'll never guess what happened. Somebody just called me and said: Please, Bill, enough is enough. Enough! I believe, I understand! I know, I've gone, I've looked, I've verified! (laughs) And I -- you know what I did? I asked him, "Well, if you know and understand all this, have you called Swiss America Trading yet?" And he said, "What?" And I said, "Have you called Swiss America Trading yet?"

[William Cooper does commercial for Swiss America Trading]

(audio playback begins)

(brief instrumental music)

[DW]: [Audio cuts in suddenly] about the difference between the Old World Order and the New World Order?

[JM]: We're hearing this term, "New World Order," and our troops are in the Middle East because of something called a "New World Order." I just wanted to bring, uh, to your attention the reason for that term. Europe is referred to as the Old World, and the power structure of the Old World was referred to as the "Old World Order". I mean, the old Roman dynasties, the Rothschild's of England, the banking dynasties throughout Europe, and the whole power structure of what we call Europe was the European Old World Order, and it dominated the world for almost sixteen hundred years, Europe has dominated the world [sic]. But with the coming of America, or Christo-Columbia (?), uh, the founding of America, we now are in what we called New World. Consequently, there is a new world power structure in Western civilization, and, uh, centered in America, and so that's what George Bush is talking about, a New World Order is a new world fraternal order, because the world in the dictionary means a fraternal, or knightly order, uh, like the Masonic Order or Lodge. And so, what we're talking about the Old World Order is a power structure centered in the New World. And we're seeing terminologies in movies and motion pictures like we said, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas with The Empire Strikes Back. It has to do with New York being the Empire State, the state of the new empire, connecting New York with the old York dynasty in England, and, uh, America strikes back at the Old Order, which is the first and second World War, and if you understand the connections between the Vatican and the European banking families, and Europe being the Old World Order, as opposed to America being, uh, a New World Order. And the empire strikes back, and of course the head of the - all Freemasons will recognize that Yota is little Yuda, or Yota is the ideologue of the Knights Templars Freemasonic Order, giving us what we call the York Rite, or New York. And, so all of these things are mystical symbols and emblems, and from that, we can open up a can of words, and all kinds of...

[AH]: But it gets down to the bottom line, the bottom line of this whole thing is one world government.

[JM]: Right.

[AH]: "Ein volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer." They want one world, one currency, one race, one religion, and, if you

ever read anything from Global 2000, you'll find out that they plan to reduce the population of this planet

by twenty-five percent by the year 2000. And how are they going to do that? Designer diseases. It's my thesis, it's

Dr. Robert Strecker's thesis, that they have created AIDS, and disseminated AIDS through the Hepatitis B vaccinate

shots to the homosexual community in the United States with the Public Health Service, and to the blacks in

Senegal, Uganda, Zaire, the central African republic Haiti and Brazil, for the purpose of reducing the population

of the planet by this twenty-five percent by the year 2000 through the smallpox vaccine shots over there.

[DW]: Yeah, what I have a, a difficult un-, trying to get by here as a lot of people do too, is you're naming a lot

of things: I mane, the Empire State Building with the empire, Yoda with the Knights Templar, now we're talking

about AIDS. I'm just wondering -- and Christopher Columbus -- isn't there any part of human history where things

are just -- the result of incompetence where things just happen?

[AH]: There's a conspiracy...

[DW]: Everything is a conspiracy...

[AH]: ...of this oligarchy to bring about this global government upon the ashes of the United States government of

America. And all of you will be enslaved, or slaughtered if you don't go along with their gig...

[JM]: ...the new plan.

[AH]: ...the plan of New World Order, Novus Ordo Seclorum. It's on the dollar bill. Adolf Hitler wrote it,

George Bush is implementing it.

[DW]: Well, a lot of people are concerned about AIDS...

[AH]: is a man-made disease, created at Fort Detrick, there's no question in my mind about that. The World

Health Organization went out to give these smallpox vaccine shots to the innocent blacks, and AIDS is vector born.

AIDS is a cancer. They don't want to come up with a cure until the population of Africa has been diminished

substantially. I think that black people in Africa are an endangered species. In south central Los Angeles, not far

from where we are right now, at one high school with kids giving blood to the blood bank, it was discovered that

there was 90% that were HIV positive. These are teenage black kids. I'm saying that AIDS is not simply epidemic, or

pandemic. It's mega-pandemic, and AIDS is murder. This is a designer disease, and it is a program to mass murder

people upon the planet to reduce the population.

[DW]: Talking about south central, uh, the Illuminati, uh, began, if I'm to understand you right, on May the 1st,

1776, and you were ascribing some sort of significance of the fact that the riot recently happened on...

[AH]: May the 1st.

[DW]: April 29th to May 1st.

[JM]: That's right. May 1st was the founding date of the Bavarian Illuminati in Germany in the year 1776. This you

can find in any encyclopedia in any library. Look up the word, "Illuminati." Illuminati comes from "illumined" or

"illuminate," meaning the worship of light. The Enlightened Ones, those who are the masters who manipulate the

world finance and manipulate world government. The Illuminati was founded May 1st, 1776, and that's why in Soviet

Union and all Communist countries, you have a great celebration on May Day. May Day was a symbol for – May Day was

the celebration of the founding of the world revolution conspiracy in Germany, and then later on goes into France

and to, uh...

[AH]: ...and I hope they don't have to burn the city before the people see the real light...

[JM]: ...and so, that's why our riot that happened here in Los Angeles happened on May 1st. It was all prearranged,

pre-setup by this government, had nothing to do with the people in the area. I have talked to many of the black

community of the area...

[DW]: Wait, say, "this government," you're talking about those who control this government...

[JM]: Yeah, I'm talking about those who control this government, not the government itself, but those who are

behind the scenes, who control this government and decide what it will and will not do.

[AH]: And control the black projects, the Central Intelligence Agency.

[DW]: Are you able to zero in on exactly who these people are who are the government, the government calling


[AH]: The invisible government, talking about the invisible government.

[DW]: Yeah.

[AH]: I talk about it as an evilarchy.

[DW]: Well, are you able to tear -- zero in on who these people are in this evilarchy?

[AH]: As a group, the members of the Council on Foreign Relations. I'm not saying all members of the Council on

Foreign Relations are Illumnists. Members of the Trilateral Commission, members of the Club of Rome, the Skull and

Bones fraternity, the Bohemian society -- here's a group of presidents up there with black robes, like Klansmen,

sitting around this huge bonfire at the Bohemian Grove, uh, worshiping this giant owl.

[JM]: Yeah, we have color pictures of this, we have color pictures of the presidents of the United States, all

living presidents today, uh, dressed in large black robes with pointed headdresses like the Ku Klux Klan in front

of a large open fire pit, a pit of fire, uh, in the article appeared said that it was after twelve midnight, all

the American presidents line up on this altar, and worship the owl. And they said the reason why the owl was used

in their worship is because it is wise, because it is able to see things in the dark. There's a message there. The

owl is wise because it sees things in the dark, and that's why the presidents and the heads of state and the heads

of the government that we live under, all meet at one o'clock, at twelve o'clock at night, uh, to worship the owl.

[AH]: Yeah, but if you don't believe it, if you don't believe it, we will come back and do another show and Jordan

will pull out pictures...

[DW]: Yes, I want to see those pictures.

[AH]: ...and you can zero in on Gerald Ford, who has some sort of Satanic shrine at his home, as I understand it

from inside sources. Uh, I had talked to one fellow at a -- this is in Anaheim years ago, at Knott's Berry Farm

after a Billy James Hargis meeting, who claimed to be a member of some witches coven. He mentioned two congressmen

which were involved in Satanic cults, and they were, I guess, warlocks. And, uh, I only remembered one, because he

was the number one congressman for the Republican party, the House minority leader, Gerald Ford, then later the

selected, non-elected President, who then selected the non-elected vice-President, Nelson Rockefeller. So, we had a

President and vice-President of the United States that were not elected by us, but selected by them. And if you

take a look at the administrations of Ronald Reagan, who said that Jimmy Carter should be criticized, or criticize

Carter for having had eighteen members of the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission appointed to

key positions in his administration. Ronald Reagan had an excess of two hundred. He's as phony as a three-dollar

bill. Ronald Reagan is not a right-winger, folks. He is a phony, he is a phony, he is a phony.

[JM]: He was known in Hollywood as, "Red Ronnie."

[AH]: "Red Ronnie," yeah. "Red Ronnie."

[DW]: You've indicated that this conspiracy, uh, has some goal, uh, that they want to accomplish by the year 2000.

I was wondering if you can spell that out for me.

[AH]: Now, I've done an article, called Global 2000. There's a thing out there, and you've read it in

Life Magazine. You've seen the front cover of the NASA SETI program. You've seen the big, big, uh, picture

from outer space and, uh, they talked about a hundred million dollar investment. A hundred million dollars to

invest, to find out whether there is extraterrestrial intelligence. Well, there's, there's – they got something

going, here. You remembered War of the Worlds?

[DW]: The radio broadcast?

[AH]: Yes, by Orson Welles in 1939?

[DW]: Mmhmm, yes.

[AH]: Well, we've got something else coming in. They're going to make the announcement that they have discovered

extraterrestrial intelligence! And this will frighten the people of the world, saying, "Oh my God! How can we deal

with this as a nation? Well, we can only deal with it as the United Nations, yes! We're going to have a United

Nations, a one-world government, yeah. It's necessary," they're going to say. " It's absolutely necessary." Why?

[DW]: Tell me.

[AH]: To defend ourselves from those little green men, from the aliens that are out there. They will make that

announcement, and the whole program is phony. It stinks, it's setup and you're going to be the patsy, unless you

understand what's going down and who's doing what to whom.

[JM]: And if you -- and if you think that's, uh, far, far-fetched, just remember that the Soviet Union was put

before us in our media and our television and our radio and our newspapers as being an evil empire; a frightening,

powerful, evil, militaristic empire...

[AH]: Who can't even feed its own people.

[JM]: ...and now today, we find out that it's like the Wizard of Oz. He comes out from behind the curtain and we

find out they've been stared all their life. They can't even grow enough potatoes to make vodka, they have to

import the potatoes, they haven't even got a railroad track across their country; they're starving, they have

always been starving, they're broke, and the only military materials that had was the stuff that we sent to them

that we aren't even using anymore, shelves of rockets, shelves of planes, and it's just an evil empire on paper.

They're starving.

[AH]: You asked about this Luciferian thing by the year 2000. I was concerned when they sent up the Galileo

mission, because they sent up the Galileo mission to explore the planet Jupiter. That went up in 19 -- what is --

87 or so?

[JM]: I don't even know...

[AH]: Something like that. It's already gone. It's on its way, folks. It's going to Jupiter. It's going to reach

the planet by 1995, it's going to circle the planet...

[JM]: Mmhmm.

[AH]: ...and then by 1999, it's going to be drawn into the planet, where it will simply explode. What does it have

on it? It's got 49 ¼ pounds of plutonium, even for...well, let's say, ten hydrogen bombs. What is the atmosphere of

Jupiter made up of? Hydrogen. Now this, if it could -- if it were to be ignited, it would give us a second sun.

[JM]: Right.

[AH]: And I thought, my God...year 2000, a second sun. Where have I read that before? Something struck me -- I

said, wait a minute,..Arthur C. Clark, 2010: Odyssey 2. I went back to the last chapter. Guess what the last

chapter is called? "Lucifer Rising." And he talks about the ignition of the planet Jupiter by the year 2010. And,

he said at the very end of the book – and you can read it, go to the library, pick it up, look at it – he said that

the NASA space program was interested, a Dr. Robert Jathro, I think it was, or Jethro, was interested in this

particular thesis for the Galileo mission. So we're talking about a space exploration program, that not only is

going to go, it already went up. That was in 1982. This was sent up five years later. It's already on its way. If

that thing ignites, it would give us a dual solar system...

[JM]: So what we're talking about is two sides...

[AH]: ...and they rename the planet from Jupiter to Lucifer.

[JM]: Right.

[AH]: That's exactly what Arthur C. Clark talks about in 2010, so we're talking about Lucifer 2000.

[JM]: There'll be no more nighttime, so there'll be more no opportunity for crime at night. There'll be more sun

now, because you will have two suns now in our solar system, so that you can increasing (growing system)...

[AH]: ...and the increase of the growing system like the Matamosca Valley, just north of Anchorage, Alaska.

[JM]: And this might sound pretty far-fetched, but you had better look at the facts. The fact is, is that this

thing is carrying plutonium, it's going to Jupiter and they know what it's going to do when it does crash. So...

[AH]: And as NASA said in their space program, could be used as a vehicle to frighten the people of the planet into

surrendering their sovereignty into accepting a one-world government. And they've talked about a thing out here

called the Federal Emergency Management Association, which came, en masse, when the riots took place. They

create chaos, and they create control.

[JM]: Over the world headquarters in Switzerland of the world Masonic headquarters for world Freemasonry, over the

door is Ordo Ab Chao, which is Latin for "Order out of Chaos." And all Freemasons know that term, Ordo Ab

Chao. Order out of chaos; the concept is to create chaos, to create the problems, then while the people are

frightened to death of all the crime and everything that seems to be out of control, a riotous situation, the

government then moves in with justification. In order to put down this terrible chaos, they must have full power of

the military, full obedience of the people to give the government full power to do whatever they want. That's why

we have, in all over the world, wars, riots, bloodshed, famines, all kinds of things happening around the world, is

being manipulated. It's being orchestrated, not just for Los Angeles, but...

[AH]: It's conflict control.

[JM]: Conflict control.

[AH]: There's been more wars since the creation of the United Nations then before the creation of the United

Nations. More wars since 1945 to 1992 then from the beginning of time through 1945.

[JM]: Let me explain this for...

[AH]: And the people who created the United Nations were from the Council on Foreign Relations. One of the [first

secretary general of the United Nations organization, or CFR]...

[DW]: When fundamentalists kind of talk about their ideas kind of parallel to this, uh, they at least have what

they consider to be some ray of hope that Christ will come down and save us all or something like that. Do you, do

the two of you [individual, whatever] have any kind of hope or anything you can give us?

[AH]: Yes, a creation of a free world alliance.

[DW]: A free world alliance?

[AH]: A free world alliance, that's the creation of many, many, many different nations where individual rights and

sovereignty is respected, so that we can do our own thing on our own time. I'm talking about laissez-faire.

I'm talking about free enterprise, not [part of] Socialism that we have right now.

[DW]: Would it be fair to call you a Libertarian or not?

[AH]: I'm an anarchical capitalist libertarian, uh, quasi-conservative.

[DW]: Uh-huh.

[AH]: I believe in conserving not the status quo, but conserving freedom, and these freedoms that we have are

drifting away. They're going through our fingers like water or sand. We've got to grasp hold of the Constitution.

We have to use that document or we're going to lose it.

[JM]: And the problem is education, that's where the real power is, is in that of educating people. Uh, I have no,

I myself am not looking to have anyone come back, no Messiah to come back to help. I'm not looking to any of this.

I, my belief is, is that knowledge is the thing that's needed. People need to wake up and discover who is running

their government, what the symbols of government mean, what these emblems mean when they see the national coat of

arms, the flags, the emblems, the seals, the symbols. All of these things mean something. Educate yourself. Find

out where it came from. That's the only hope I see for the human race is the human race itself waking up to find

out we've been had.

[AH]: You know, the oligarchy has a Messiah: Lord Maitreya. I can him, "Lord Betraya," who's wrapped in with

theosophical society, wrapped in with all these Luciferian crap. You go up to [little Satan place], in Ojai Valley,

I was raised up there in Ojai Valley, you're gonna find the Blavatskites, and you're gonna find the, uh,

Krishnamurti group right next door in the Meditation Mountain, and I believe that they're going to try and

introduce this Lord Maitreya as the Jesus, the Buddha of the, uh, as the new Mohamed, uh, he's going to be all

things to all people, and they're going to be talking about a global government, and we have to unify, we have to

[bridge] -- dissolve all our differences, and sort of come into one amalgamated, homogenized group.

[JM]: Let me, let me also bring out that Adam Weishoff in his writings that talked about -- if a group wanted to

take over the world, and this would totally be an impossible mission, but if they -- and incidentally, that's what

where we get Mission Impossible from, Impossible Mission Force, which is , if you'll remember in the movie,

Impossible Mission Force was the IMF, which is the International Monetary Fund, and the Impossible Mission Force

was always working for the government, uh, overthrowing kings, rulers and princes. But, of course, the government

has nothing to do with it, and they were...

[AH]: They were the bad guys...

[JM]: Yeah.

[AH]: And the one-world oligarchy is the good guys.

[JM]: Of course. Television has been doing this for years, and they movies like Get Smart. Get Smart.

And in Get Smart, what did you have? You have the two sides: chaos and control. And again, we have Ordo Ab

Chao. Chaos and control, that's the way you get control is by causing chaos.

[AH]: It's Hegelian politics.

[JM]: The Hegelian dialectic, yes.

[AH]: The illusionary right, the Nazi Nationalist Socialists, and the Communists. Now, the Nazis believed in total

government. The Communists believed in total government. You say, well, gee, I'm not over there, I'm sort of down

the middle, and you're half-Nazi and half-Communist. Adolf Hitler said basically that National Socialism and

Marxism are the same. He said that on February 5th, 1941. So they're the same.

[JM]: They're identical, absolutely. So, what I'm saying is that, uh, when you get back to the original symbols and

emblems of the secret societies and you understand, as Adam Weishoff wrote, which is what I was going to bring out

-- Adam Weishoff wrote that the one thing that bring all nations together, all peoples together, because there's so

much differences between races and individuals, but the one thing all individuals will come together for is to save

their own hide. So, if you can create enough bloodshed, enough violence, enough anarchy; if you can finance,

organize and direct it correctly to cause enough civil unrest, civil right, uh, or law -- unrest...

[AH]: How [creating] a New World Order by creating what? The illusion that there are men from outer space. There

won't simply be a war of the world, this is a war that is declared against the world and that's what they're trying

to bring out. If you take a look at the background of George Bush, take a look at the background of Adolf Hitler.

Where did he get his money? Senator Prescott Bush was involved as the chief man at Brown Brothers Harriman. Brown

Brothers Harriman was involved in the financing of Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler came...

[JM]: So was General Motors, General Electric, uh...

[AH]: Standard Oil.

[JM]: Standard Oil. All of these corporations got to be large corporations because they were financing both sides

during the second World War. And that's...

[AH]: That's conflict control.

[JM]: It's conflict...yeah, it's called conflict control.

[AH]: World War II was engineered. Wars, like bridges are engineered. They're created.

[JM]: You don't think the people that own...

[AH]: It doesn't happen by accident.

[JM]: You don't think that people who run the Ford Motor Company or General Electric could get up in the morning

and have their meeting, and decide what they're going to do today? They don't plan what they're going to do today.

People -- they have highly trained people who know what the company is going to be doing ten years from today. They

have an agenda. They know how many -- how much oil is going to be needed ten years from today, how much rubber, how

much glass; they have to know these things. You have to plan for the international corporations, ten, twenty years

ahead of time. And if you think they do it, you have to know that this government does it. And the...

[AH]: When the true...

[JM]: ...when you understand that things are planned for the future.

[AH]: When the tomb at Yale University was violated, when they broke in, they went into one room and here was all

this Nazi paraphernalia. This is the fraternity...

[JM]: At Yale University.

[AH]: …where George Bush laid nude in the coffin, was born again into the Satanic order, they go into the one's all the Nazi paraphernalia.

[JM]: Jimmy Carter, Jimmy Carter used to talk about how he was thrice born, and all Christians said, oh, that means

he was born again. No, he said thrice born. Freemasons know what that means. If you are an occultist or into

Freemasonry, you know what the term "thrice born" means, and it hasn't got a thing to do with Christianity. It

means that you have been initiated into the secret society.

[DW]: Ane we're running out of time, uh, quickly here, and, uh, ...

[AH]: We're running out of time as a nation.

[JM]: Yeah.

[DW]: Well, this is certainly a tall order...I mean, I used to think that Campus Crusades...

(audio playback fades out)

[William Cooper]: Well, ladies and gentlemen, if you think you've had enough, don't you ever, ever tune into this

program again, because in my estimation there's no such thing as enough. And I'm going to continue to shove this

thing down your throats until you understand it. For those of you who want more, listen to the Hour of the Time

every Monday through Friday night.

(closing audio clip -- movie?): And this is a...this is evidence of double-mindedness. This is evidence of the fact

that we don't really understand how we the people are being manipulated by the powers that be, the high cabal, the

forces of evil. If you want to try to put a definite label on it, you're going to play into the hands of the

organism itself. You -- (audio is cutoff)

Friday, September 24, 2010

Guilty As Charged - UN Report On Flotilla Massacre

By Stephen Lendman

On September 22, Reuters headlined the news, saying:

"UN Experts Condemn Israel Attack on Gaza Flotilla"

It explained that the UN Human Rights Council's (HRC) "panel of international experts" concluded what was obvious on day one - that Israel's international water attack "was unlawful and resulted in violations of human rights and international humanitarian law...."

A one paragraph AP report said the same thing. America's leading paper, The New York Times (always pro-Israeli), published the above two accounts, not its own, ducking its responsibility to do in detail.

In contrast, Israeli papers covered it prominently, including Haaretz headlining, "UN Human Rights Council: Israel flotilla raid broke international law," saying:

"The UN Human Rights Council's fact-finding mission concluded that Israel's naval blockade of the Palestinian territory was unlawful because of the humanitarian crisis there, and described the military raid on the flotilla as brutal and disproportionate."

Israel's response was unsurprising, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ygal Palmor saying:

"Israel is a democratic and law abiding country that carefully observes international law and, when need be, knows how to investigate itself."

True on the last point, but it never does nor will it. False on the others. As honest observers know, Israel is a lawless, undemocratic, pariah state believing in Jewish exclusivity above all other religions. As a result, its 1,548,000 Israeli Arabs (as of spring 2010) have no rights. In addition, the four million + in Gaza and the West Bank (Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics mid-2010 figures) have been persecuted under military occupation for over 43 years, living in constant terror.

Balad Party MK Hanin Zuabi, on board the Mavi Marmara mother ship, praised the HRC's report, saying "the criminals who ordered and carried out the raid should be brought to justice." More on Israeli retribution against her below.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said "Now it's required to be a mechanism in order to translate this report into action and to bring occupation commanders to trial for the crimes they committed." Indeed so, but no measures whatever have been proposed or implemented.

Information on the Flotilla Massacre

Seven earlier articles covered it in detail, accessed through the following links:

The Human Rights Council (HRC) Report

On May 31, 2010, Israeli commandos attacked unarmed, nonviolent civilians attempting to deliver vitally needed humanitarian aid to 1.5 million Gazans, trapped under siege for three years at the time. At least nine were murdered in cold blood, over 50 wounded, some seriously. They and the others were arrested, detained, and treated harshly until let out of the country to go home.

Released on September 22, the HRC (called the Mission below) report detailed serious Israeli crimes of war and against humanity, based on 112 witness testimonies in Geneva, London, Istanbul and Amman as well as other information, including forensic evidence, video footage, and other photographic material. As a result, the HRC:

"concluded that a series of violations of international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law, were committed by the Israeli forces during the interception of the flotilla and during the detention of passengers in Israel prior to deportation."

The Mission thanked the Turkish and Jordanian governments for cooperation. Also OCHA, UNRWA, UNSCO and others for their help. Israel refused, saying its position was "one of non-recognition of and non-cooperation with the Mission."

Under international law, Israel's blockade is illegal. It caused a grave humanitarian crisis affecting 1.5 million Gazans, mostly civilians. Aid is vitally needed. Attacking anyone trying to deliver it is a clear crime against humanity, especially in international waters.

A "vessel on the high seas (posing no threat) is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of its flag State."

Under the laws of armed conflict, "a blockade is illegal if:

(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or

(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade."

In other words, no blockade is permitted it it inflicts disproportionate harm to civilians. Israel has done it grievously for over three years, suffocating 1.5 million Gazans illegally.

Among other international law provisions, Fourth Geneva's Article 33 states:

"No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism, are prohibited."

The Mission called Israel's blockade disproportionate and illegal, and the attack on the Flotilla unjustified and criminal.

International law regarding occupying powers is clear and unequivocal, enumerating explicit responsibilities. Israel is a serial violator. Gazans are protected persons. So were Flotilla passengers. Israel was prohibited from intercepting and attacking them. Under the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Article 6, paragraph 1:

"Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life."

The Mission said "This right is non-derogable." The Flotilla interdiction was lawless "since there was no legal basis for the Israeli forces to conduct an assault and interception in international waters. Moreover," in doing so, Israel was "obligated" under international law and its own "international human rights obligations."

Under Article 2 of the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement:

"in the performance of their duty, law enforcement officials shall respect and protect human dignity and maintain and uphold the human rights of all persons."

Article 3 states:

"Law enforcement officials may use force only when strictly necessary and to the extent required for the performance of their duty."

Israel, of course, used commandos, heavily armed trained killers, acting as law enforcers, instead of the Coast Guard or other protective forces. Clearly their mission was well-defined - to interdict, attack and murder designated targets, their names and photos provided in advance. Evidence uncovered proved it.

The Mission concluded that force used "was unnecessary, disproportionate, excessive and inappropriate and resulted in the wholly avoidable killing and maiming of a large number of civilian passengers."

It determined that at least six of the dead were killed by "extra-legal, arbitrary and summary executions," some shot multiple times in the head at close range. In addition, passengers detained weren't told why or informed of their rights, in violation ICCPR's Article 9, paragraph 2 stating:

"Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him."

It wasn't done, "and in some instances passenger requests for such information were met with verbal abuse or physical violence."

On board the vessels and in detention, Israel treated them cruelly and inhumanely in clear violation of international law. As a result, injuries resulted or were exacerbated. For all onboard, willful pain and suffering were inflicted. For some, it amounted to torture, an Israeli specialty.

From the moment of interdiction until release and departure, their entire experience was shocking, excessive, disproportionate, and criminal, in violation of numerous international and Israeli laws.

In addition, Israel made "a deliberate suppress or destroy evidence" besides fabricating its version of events, including fake videos and other falsified materials.

Another offense also deserves mention. Haneen Zouabi, an Israeli MK was on board the Mavi Marmara. She wasn't detained, but was extensively and abusively interrogated. Because of her participation, the Knesset voted on June 7 to deny her three parliamentary privileges:

-- to travel abroad;

-- retain her diplomatic passport; and

-- have her legal fees paid if losing her parliamentary immunity results in criminal prosecution.

In addition, during Knesset discussions of her participation, racist, sexist, and physically threatening remarks were made. Some MKs also wanted her criminally prosecuted and removed from the Knesset. Further, Israel's Interior Minister, Eli Yishai, accused her of treason and requested authorization from the Attorney General to revoke her citizenship. So far, no action has been taken, but Zouabi continues to receive death threats.

Final Comments

The Mission concluded that Israel caused "a humanitarian crisis (on) May 31, 2010," the day of the attack. "The preponderance of evidence from impeccable sources is far too overwhelming to come to a contrary opinion." Israel's justification on "security grounds" is entirely baseless. Moreover, "prosecutions" are clearly warranted under Fourth Geneva's Article 147, covering:

-- willful killing;

-- torture or inhuman treatment; and

-- willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health.

Remedial action should be guaranteed all victims. Those responsible should be held criminally culpable. Their crimes shouldn't go unpunished. Those aboard are left with "deep psychological scars....The Mission is not alone in" condemning Israel for its actions, nor about Gaza's "deplorable (and lawless) situation."

So far, passengers have been denied justice, and culpable Israeli officials remain unaccountable, unpunished, and free to keep rampaging, what happens daily in Occupied Palestine while so-called "peace talks" continue, a charade by any standard.


Poker Face plays NYC tomorrow night Sat Sept 25th 9pm

Poker Face GIGS
UC Lounge @ 9pm sharp Sept 25
87 Ludlow St.

GIG Sat Oct 9th
(Before each of the night shoots starting around 5pm)
@ Knob Creek, KY

September 2010 Poker Faces Response to last months Local Media Circus
Open Letter To Bobby Gunther Walsh & All Media

This is the reason for our response to BGW:

The source of all of this press in the summer was because we threw our support behind Independent candidate Jake Towne (PAs 15th Congressional District) the only non-owned PAC and non-owned mafia candidate running). The local politicos are scared of Jake, and have tried to bar him from several debates. Read some of the comic-tragedy here:

Poker Face Official Site

Ahmadinejad Calls for UN Investigation Into 9/11

UNITED NATIONS (Sept. 23) -- The U.S. delegation walked out of the United Nations' annual showpiece event today after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad pinned responsibility for 9/11 on American and Israeli "segments" and called for an international investigation into the terrorist attacks nine years ago.

Listing several conspiracy theories, Ahmadinejad said that most people and politicians in the United States and abroad believed "that some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East, in order also to save the Zionist regime."

He also proposed "that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of September 11 so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden."

Ahmadinejad was speaking at the annual debate of the U.N. General Assembly, where U.S. President Barack Obama had earlier today said in his speech that "the door remains open to diplomacy should Iran choose to walk through it. But the Iranian government must demonstrate a clear and credible commitment, and confirm to the world the peaceful intent of its nuclear program."

It has become an annual routine for Tehran and Washington to exchange barbs during this event, with the U.S. usually walking out as the Iranian leader launches into a series of provocative remarks when it's his turn to speak.

"Rather than representing the aspirations and goodwill of the Iranian people, Mr. Ahmadinejad has yet again chosen to spout vile conspiracy theories and anti-Semitic slurs that are as abhorrent and delusional as they are predictable," Mark Kornblau, a U.S. spokesman, said in a statement that was circulated even before the speech was over.

Ahmadinejad spent the first half of his speech bashing capitalism and Western-dominated international governance structures in a rambling sort of way. He then zeroed in on the U.S. by calling for a U.N. investigation into 9/11 and criticizing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?" he said.

The Iranian president also said that his country would host "a conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it" and invited researchers, scholars and officials from the entire world to attend.

Ahmadinejad also reiterated his position that 9/11 was used as an excuse by the U.S. to occupy other countries under the guise of addressing a threat. The Iranian leader said that while 3,000 people had died on 9/11, many more Iraqis and Afghans had lost their lives since.

Sponsored Links
"Then a propaganda machine came into full force and it was implied that the whole world was exposed to a huge danger, mainly that of terrorism," he said.

Turning to the issue of Iran's controversial nuclear program, Ahmadinejad slammed the U.S. and other members of the Security Council for equating nuclear energy with the nuclear bomb in the case of his country, while maintaining their own stockpiles and allowing Israel to keep its nuclear weapons.

"I would like here to propose that the year 2011 be proclaimed the year of nuclear disarmament and 'nuclear energy for all, nuclear weapons for none,' " he said.

In a private meeting on Sept. 19, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged Ahmadinejad to cooperate with the international community and allay fears about Iran's nuclear program, which the Iranians claim has solely civilian aims.

The latest report of the U.N. nuclear watchdog expressed concern that Tehran is still not being transparent about its program.

Arguing that a select few powers in the Security Council should not be allowed to dominate world affairs, Ahmadinejad said, "The Iranian nation and the majority of the world's nations and governments are against the current discriminatory management of the world."


Ahmadinejad Speaks at UN, American Delegates Walk Out

Aafia Siddiqui Sentenced - A Grievous Miscarriage Of Justice

By Stephen Lendman

On September 23 in federal court, US District Court Judge Richard Berman sentenced political prisoner Aafia Siddiqui to 86 years in prison. Outrage most accurately expresses this gross miscarriage of justice, compounding what she's already endured following her March 30, 2003 abduction, imprisonment, torture, prosecution, and conviction on bogus charges.

Earlier articles explained her case in detail, accessed through the following links:

In modern times, she's one of American depravity's most aggrieved victims, now given a virtual life sentence for a crime she didn't and couldn't have committed, explained in the above articles.

In recent months, she's been in New York's Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in maximum security solitary confinement, during her trial, conviction and September 23 sentencing. Importantly, her life was effectively destroyed by years of horrific tortures, repeated rapings, and other abuses in Bagram Prison at America's Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan.

Addressing the court, said said "I'm not paranoid. I'm not mentally ill. I don't agree with" anyone saying so, though it's hard imagining why not after years of horrific brutalization. A Pakistani/American scientist, years of torture and abuse destroyed her persona, yet somehow she survived and endured more stress from prosecution, a travesty of a trial, conviction and sentencing.

Reporting on the court's decision, the BBC repeated government lies, including her possessing bomb making instructions to blow up New York landmarks - "evidence that she was a potentially dangerous terrorist." Yet her indictment was on totally different charges - preposterous ones accusing her of the following:

In the presence of two FBI agents, two Army interpreters, and three US Army officers, this frail 110 pound woman allegedly assaulted three of them, seized one of their rifles, opened fire at close range, hit no one, yet she alone was severely wounded.

At trial, no credible evidence was presented. The charges were concocted and bogus. None accused her of plotting to blow up New York or any other landmarks or facilities.

Yet proceedings were carefully orchestrated. Witnesses were enlisted, pressured, coerced, and/or bribed to cooperate. Jurors were then intimidated to convict, her attorney Elaine Whitfield Sharp, saying their verdict was "based on fear, not fact." No evidence was presented except claims government prosecutors invented to convict.

The International Tribune also highlighted today's proceedings, headlining "Dr. Aafia sentenced to 86 years imprisonment," saying:

It was on seven counts "for allegedly firing at US troops in Afghanistan." After the announcement, protests erupted across Pakistan. In Karachi, civil society and political party workers rallied "in front of the Karachi Press Club....ask(ing) the federal government" to intervene on her behalf.

Jamaat-e-Islami, PASBAN, Defense of Human Rights, and other civil society members marched toward the US Embassy, expressing outrage and demanding she be released "as a goodwill gesture."

"Advisor to Sindh Chief Minister Ms. Sharmila Farooqui asked the United States to release (her) on humanitarian (grounds) as a goodwill gesture to Pakistan....Now is the time for the US to show goodness and pardon a Pakistani woman who is innocent."

Farooqui said Aafia was wrongly abducted, then handed over to US authorities. She's "an innocent woman," outrageously treated, convicted and sentenced.

Explaining further she said:

"In Islam and Pakistan, handing over a woman to foreign countries is a sin, but it is a pity that an innocent woman was mercilessly given in(to the) hands of the (previous) US" government.

She also urged international human rights organizations to actively pursue her release.

A Final Comment

At issue is 9/11 truth, the subsequent bogus "war on terror" based on a lie, America's war on Islam that followed against Iraq, Afghanistan, and Muslim Americans, victimized for political advantage. Aafia is perhaps its most aggrieved living victim, her persona destroyed and life ended by a virtual life sentence unless clemency or world pressure saves her.

Her case should incite everyone's moral outrage. It also reveals America's true face, its rogue agenda, targeting Muslims for their faith and ethnicity, making us all equally vulnerable.


William Cooper's Mystery Babylon: Part 27 – In the Coils of the Coming Conflict

Transcribed by wakingup72


All around the world, once again, you are listening to the Hour of the Time. I'm your host, William Cooper.

(opening music: The Triumphal March, written by Edvard Grieg)

[announcement of radio station broadcast]:

What you just heard, ladies and gentlemen, was The Triumphal March from Sigurd Jorsalfar [translation: Sigurd the Crusader], conducted by [Ed] Grieg. And I played it because I got some wonderful news. It is a triumph, in a way, at least I believe it is. I think you're all going to be happy, especially those of you who live in the state of Florida, because you're not going to have to pick through all the static on shortwave to hear the Hour of the Time anymore. In fact, we're going to be on a new radio station there, and it's sort of making history in a way, because it's the first radio station in the United States, and maybe even in the world, that's broadcast on the S-A-P, or SAP channel, the S-A-P channel. It's radio 27, WSAP, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. UHF TV 27, SAP, Separate Audio Program, the executive offices are Skinner Broadcasting Incorporated, 600 West Hillsboro Boulevard, Suite 27, Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33441-1609. You can phone them, just in case you don't get this all written down in which you know, if you listen to this program, is a sin. You're not supposed to listen to this program without a pad of paper and a pen or pencil. You're supposed to write everything down. But here's the number: (305) 480-2727. All of you folks in Florida, you're going to want to call that number and found out, make sure that you can get this program. (305) 480-2727. We'll be broadcast in stereo, folks, in crystal clear stereo. You will love it, especially if you're used to hear it in shortwave radio through all the static and the [inaudible] and the jamming and the teletype stuff and everything else that they tell me is out there interfering. For release, August 16th, 1993, you're hearing this broadcast on Tuesday, our first broadcast on 27 was actually last night, folks, last night. Some of you may have had your TV accidentally set on the SAP channel and you may have heard it. If you did, that's fine. If you didn't, you can hear it from now on. I think it's too late when you hear this in Florida to get our broadcast tonight, but you'll be able to listen to it tomorrow night in primetime. You don't even have to stay up late anymore, folks. Isn't it wonderful? A new radio station, WSAP, signed on the air Monday, August 16th, 1993. The first of its kind in the nation. America's first radio station on television. "What," you say, "a radio station on television?" That's right, folks, you heard it correctly. Home of the all-American talk show team, 24-hours a day, WSAP broadcast with 70,000 watts on the SAP, or separate audio program, channel over UHF TV 27, Fort Lauderdale.

Listeners may tune to the station in one of either two ways, so listen very carefully. Write this down. If you live in Florida, you may hear your cable system read to you right now. Here's how you can get the Hour of the Time on WSAP all over the state of Florida. Number one, by tuning in to channel six on the following cable systems: Continental Cable, Coral Springs Cable, Jones InterCable, TCI Cable of Hollywood, TCI Cable of North Dade, Gulf Pacific Cable of Weston, Bonn Adventure and Gold Coast Cable, Miami Beach. Did you hear that, folks? We're going to be at all the major hotels. After tuning to channel six on cable, then press the SAP button on your TV or remote control to hear radio WSAP, the Hour of the Time.

Now, the second method by which you can receive WSAP is by connecting a UHF loop antenna, which you can go down and get at Radio Shack, any Radio Shack, just tell them you want a UHF loop antenna, or an outside UHF antenna to the UHF antenna terminals on your television set, tuned to channel TV, or UHF TV channel 27, then press the SAP button on your TV or remote control, and you will hear WSAP.

Skinner Broadcasting Incorporated, owner of TV 27, CBS broadcasting channel 26, UCIX TV, over its main video and audio channel, and this will not change, folks. WSAP will air informative and entertaining talk show host from around the nation, 24 hours a day. Hosts include William Cooper, the Hour of the Time, 8pm Monday through Friday night and more than a dozen hard-hitting programs dealing with subjects like what really happened in Waco, how the North American Free Trade Agreement will ruin America, and the truth about the Federal Reserve System. These broadcasts are not currently heard in south Florida, and according to Roger Skinner, station manager, we expect a lot of people will soon be talking about what they heard on WSAP. Boy, that's an understatement, the Hour of the Time is libel to get them thrown out of Florida! (laughs) But this is great, folks. All of you people living in Florida now, you don't have to stay up 'til midnight and tune in to staticky shortwave. If you have one of these cable services, or if you're in the Fort Lauderdale area, or near Fort Lauderdale where you can receive their 70,000 watt SAP transmission, you can just go down to Radio Shack and hook up a UHF loop antennae on the outside of your TV set and pick us up loud and clear.

And folks, this is just the beginning, because I have something else to tell you. Beginning next week, we're going to be live on satellite and we'll be live on WWCR from that point on. Now, on WSAP in Florida, those will be taped shows. We will not be live, but we will be live on satellite and WWCR will be picking us up off satellite live and rebroadcasting Monday through Friday night at our regular time. So that also is great news. The satellite is SpaceNet-3, for those with a satellite dish, you can receive us in brilliant digital sound off of SpaceNet 3, channel 21, I believe it's 5.8 audio. But you can get that out of ...just look for Let's Talk Radio Network. That's Let's Talk Radio Network. It will be the same time you've been listening to us on WWCR shortwave, and we will still be on WWCR shortwave. The only difference is we'll be live; we'll be taped in Florida. So, even though you'll be listening to the program in Florida, a program that takes in live calls, in Florida, you will not be able to call because you will actually be listening to a taped program of a previous program, or whatever. So that's great news, folks. Remember, we're starting on WSAP last night [sic] in Florida, last night! We're already on the air there, and we're starting next week on satellite, Space Net 3, channel 21, and I believe it's 5.8 audio. If we're not on 5.8, just go up and down the audio scale until you find us or you can just look it up on SatMagazine.

So that's all the great news, folks, and I hope you're just as happy as I am because I'm tickled pink. I'm so happy, I don't know what to do with myself, and it's going to keep me very busy. Of course, expenses are going way up. Our sponsors are picking up the cost of the satellite and the air time, but we're having to purchase an awful lot of expensive equipment so we'll be able to take your calls on the air, live. Now, we're not going to do it all the time, but we are going to do it, and we need your help, folks. We need donations to pay for all this equipment. We need a thousand dollars to pay for what's called a compressor. Now, I really don't know what that means but, in order to take phone calls, in order to send this broadcast live to the satellite uplink station, we need something that's called a compressor, and that costs a thousand dollars. It's nine hundred and something dollars is the actual price. So, we need donations, we need to purchase that piece of equipment. We need to purchase another...well, we need to purchase a whole bunch of stuff. Altogether, it's going to cost us right around five thousand...a little over five thousand dollars. We will appreciate your contributions. All your contributions will go to pay for equipment only. So please, folks, sit down and write out a check or send us a money order...

(William Cooper continues request for contributions and talks about Backwoods Home Magazine)

OK, let me read this article to you. This article is...(laughs) really funny. It's called, "No Ideology, No Agenda," and it's kind of a spoof. And Dave Duffy has written up here: "We're delighted to give this issue's editorial space over to P.J. O'Rourke, who delivered these comments to a gathering of the Cato Institute, a free-market think tank. O'Rourke has authored several books, including Parliament of Whores, a best-seller about the United States government." Congress, in particular...and this article is reprinted with permission from the July 1993 American Spectator:

The Cato Institute has an unusual political cause -- which is no political cause whatsoever. We are here tonight to dedicate ourselves to that cause, to dedicate ourselves, in other words, to...nothing.

We have no ideology, no agenda, no catechism, no dialectic, no plan for humanity. We have no "vision thing," as our ex-president would say, or, as our current president would say, we have no Hillary.

All we have is the belief that people should do what people want to do, unless it causes harm to other people. And that had better be clear and provable harm. No nonsense about second-hand smoke or hurtful, insensitive language, please.

I don't know what's good for you. You don't know what's good for me. We don't know what's good for mankind. And it sometimes seems as though we're the only people who don't. It may well be that, gathered right here in this room tonight,are all the people in the world who don't want to tell all the people in the world what to do.

This is because we believe in freedom. Freedom -- what this country was established upon, what the Constitution was written to defend, what the Civil War was fought to perfect.

Freedom is not empowerment. Empowerment is what the Serbs have in Bosnia. Anybody can grab a gun and be empowered. It's not entitlement. An entitlement is what people on welfare get, and how free are they? It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights -- the "right" to education, the "right" to health care, the "right" to food and housing. That's not freedom, that's dependency. [William Cooper: And most people never learn that!] Those aren't rights, those are the rations of slavery -- hay and a barn for human cattle.

There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences.

So we are here tonight in a kind of anti-matter protest -- an unpolitical undemonstration by deeply uncommitted inactivists. We are part of a huge invisible picket line that circles the White House twenty-four hours a day. We are participants in an enormous non-march on Washington -- millions and millions of Americans not descending upon the nation's capital in order to demand nothing from the United States government. To demand nothing, that is, except the one thing which no government in history has been able to do -- [and that is] leave us alone.

There are just two rules of governance in a free society:

[One,] Mind your own business.
[And two,] Keep your hands to yourself.

Bill [Clinton], keep your hands to yourself. Hillary, mind your own business.

We have a group of incredibly silly people in the White House right now, people who think government works. Or that government would work, if you got some real bright young kids from Yale to run it.

We're being governed by dorm room bull session. The Clinton administration is over there right now pulling an all-nighter in the West Wing. They think that, if they can just stay up late enough, they can create a healthy economy and bring peace to former Yugoslavia.

The Clinton administration is going to decrease government spending by increasing the amount of money we give to the government to spend. [Makes sense, doesn't it?]

Health care is too expensive, so the Clinton administration is putting a high-powered corporate lawyer in charge of making it cheaper. (This is what I always do when I want to spend less money -- hire a lawyer from Yale.) If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free.

The Clinton administration is putting together a program so that college graduates can work to pay off their school tuition. As if this were some genius idea. It's called getting a job. Most folks do that when they get out of college, unless, of course, they happen to become governor of Arkansas.

And the Clinton administration launched an attack on people in Texas because those people were religious nuts with guns. Hell, this country was founded by religious nuts with guns. Who does Bill Clinton think stepped ashore on Plymouth Rock? Peace Corps volunteers? Or maybe the people in Texas were attacked because of child abuse. But, if child abuse was the issue, why didn't Janet Reno tear-gas Woody Allen?

You know, if government were a product, selling it would be illegal.

Government is a health hazard. Governments have killed many more people than cigarettes or unbuckled seat belts ever have.

Government contains impure ingredients -- as anybody who's looked at Congress can tell you.

On the basis of Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign promises, I think we can say government practices deceptive advertising.

And the merest glance at the federal budget is enough to convict the government of perjury, extortion, and fraud.

There, ladies and gentlemen, you have the Cato Institute's program in a nutshell: government should be against the law.

Term limits aren't enough. We need jail.

Again, that was written by P.J. O'Rourke.

(William Cooper continues to talk about Backwoods Home Magazine)

Oh boy, you know, I'm just so happy about going up on satellite and about going into 500,000 new homes in Florida, and we began that last night. This's just incredible, I don't know what to do with myself. I'm going to have to take a deep breath and settle down here and just sort of get everything together or I'm probably going to screw something up...

Now, remember, when we're on satellite, we're going to be doing some live shows where you'll be able to call in and talk to me on the air. Let me give you that number right now. This is a number where, twenty-three hours out of every day, you can fax me anything you want to fax me. That's twenty-three out of every twenty-four hours, you can fax me anything you want to fax me. So now you have a conduit to deliver information directly to the Hour of the Time with a fax machine...

(Gives information about faxing)

It's time to take our break, folks. Don't go away, I'll be right back after this very brief pause.

(few seconds of silence)

I'm back, and I'm happy. Boy, am I happy, and I want you to be happy, too, folks...

(William Cooper does a commercial for Swiss America Trading)

(break music: unknown classical piece - continuation of The Triumphal March?)

Well, folks, I'm going to take you one step further in your education tonight. I am holding in my hands, dear listeners, an old, very old book, published in 1883 in Philadelphia by Collins & McDill. The name of this book is In the Coils; or, The Coming Conflict. Again, the book was published in 1883 in Philadelphia by Collins & McDill. The title is In the Coils; or, The Coming Conflict, by E.B.G. This is the second edition, which means there was an edition before this. And there is a quote here by Wendell Philips, who says, "This is the next great question the nation must take up and decide." And this book, ladies and gentlemen, is priceless, for it was originally copyrighted in 1882 -- actually, not copyrighted, but entered, according to an Act of Congress, in 1882 by A.P. McDill in the office of the librarian of Congress at Washington, D.C. So if you can't find this anywhere else, it is in the Library of Congress.

This is about one man's battle with Freemasonry, and I'm going to read to you a letter, which begins on page 237. This letter is written by Dr. Groves and sent to a Mr. Dover:

(start of quote)

BRANDON, May 18th, 18--.

My Dear Friend: -- I have delayed a reply to your note in order that I might be able to answer both your questions fully and with some degree of certainty.

I am glad to be able to say that I am personally acquainted with your nephew, and that I highly esteem him. I have consulted several influential men in our village, and we all agree in our opinion of Bates and his prospects in this precinct. So I can answer both of your questions together and use the plural "we" and "our," instead of showing you mine opinion alone.

We believe Bates to be the best candidate in the field as yet, and it is possible that he will have our hearty support.

We are not altogether satisfied with any of our candidates; but we do not expect to find one that will suit us in every particular. We may consistently support a person and yet have some objection to him. So in regard to Bates. We have on serious objection to him, but whether that will be in our way of supporting him depends on circumstances. I suppose you want a plain statement of the whole matter rather than any uncertain and flattering promises, and I will not be kept back by fear of offending you, or by a desire for office or popularity, from stating clearly our objection to Bates, and the circumstances in which he may probably expect our support.

We do not object to his abilities, moral character, republicanism, relatives or general fitness for the place. We appreciate him for all these. Our only objection to him is, that by certain and numerous oaths which he considers binding, (we do not, however,) he has pledged his support to a monopoly which is more powerful and dangerous than those which he professes to oppose, and has sworn his allegiance to a government which claims supremacy over all other authority whether of church or state. In a word, as we are informed, Mr. Bates is a Freemason.

Now we know that everyone who enters the lodge swears "to support the constitution of the Grand Lodge of the state, and to conform to the laws of any lodge of which he shall be a member, and also to obey all regular signs, summons or tokens from any Mason or body of Masons." Now whatever he may be told before taking this oath, after he does so he is taught that the authority of the lodge is absolute, the covenant is irrevocable, and its obligations are supreme.

In General Ahiman Rezon; or, [The] Freemason's Guide we read: "The candidate, entering the lodge, is on the point of binding himself voluntarily, absolutely and without reservation forever."

Webb's Monitor says: "The covenant is irrevocable. Even though a Mason may be suspended or expelled, though he may withdraw from the lodge, journey into countries where Masons cannot be found, or become a subject of despotic governments that persecute, or a communicant of bigoted churches that denounce Masonry, he cannot cast off or nullify his Masonic covenant. No law of the land can affect it; no anathema of the church can weaken it. It is irrevocable."

Again, this same Masonic author says: "The first duty of the reader of this synopsis is to obey the edicts of this Grand Lodge. Right or wrong, his very existence as a Mason hangs upon obedience to the power immediately set above him. Failure in this must infallibly bring down expulsion, which as a Masonic death, ends all. The one unpardonable crime in a Mason is contumacy, or disobedience."

Although it takes much space in my letter, let me give you more testimony, with the names of the witnesses, who are all eminent members of the order and high in authority and some of whose works are in nearly every lodge, and necessarily have some effect on the members:

"That this surrender of free will to Masonic authority is absolute, (within the scope of the landmarks of the order), and perpetual, may be inferred from an examination of the emblem (the Shoe or Sandal) which is used to enforce this lesson of resignation." [That's from the] Morris Dictionary of Freemasonry.

"Disobedience is so subversive of the ground work of Masonry, in which obedience is so strongly inculcated, that the Mason who disobeys subjects himself to severe penalties." -- Ibid.

"A Grand Lodge is invested with power and authority over all the craft within its jurisdiction. It is the Supreme Court of Appeals in all Masonic cases, and to its decrees unlimited obedience must be paid by every lodge and every Mason situated within its control. The government of Grand Lodges is, therefore, completely despotic. While a Grand Lodge exists, its edicts must be respected and obeyed without examination by its subordinated lodges." [That's from] Mackey, Lexicon of Freemasonry, page 183.

"For ourselves, we deny as Masons that any civil government on earth has the right to divide or curtail Masonic jurisdiction when once established. It can only be done by competent Masonic authority and in accordance with Masonic usage." -- [From the] Grand Lodge Report.

"A 'due summons' from the lodge or Grand Lodge is obligatory upon him, and should he refuse obedience he will be disgracefully expelled from the society with public marks of ignominy that can never be erased." -- [That's from the] Morris Dictionary of Freemasonry, page [number] 29.

"Disobedience and want of respect to Masonic superiors is an offense for which the transgressor subjects himself to punishment." -- [That's from] Mackey, Masonic Jurisprudence, page 511.

"Hence we find that the Master's authority in the lodge is as despotic as the sun in the firmament which was placed there by the Creator, never to deviate from its accustomed course, till the declaration is promulgated that time shall be no more." -- [That's from Oliver's] Signs and Symbols of Freemasonry, page 142.

"Treason and rebellion also, because they are altogether political offences, cannot be inquired into by a lodge; and although a Mason may be convicted of either of these acts in the courts of his country, he cannot be masonically punished; and notwithstanding his treason or rebellion his relation to the lodge, to use the language of the old charges, remains indefeasible." -- [That's from Mackey's] Masonic Jurisprudence, page 510.

[William Cooper]: Now, I'm going to read that again and I want you to pay close attention.

"Treason and rebellion also, because they are altogether political offences, cannot be inquired into by a lodge; and although a Mason may be convicted of either of these acts in the courts of his country, he cannot be masonically punished; and notwithstanding his treason or rebellion his relation to the lodge, to use the language of the old charges, remains indefeasible." -- [That's from Mackey's] Masonic Jurisprudence, page 510.

"There is no duty more forcibly enjoined in Masonry than that of warning a brother or danger impending to his person or interests. To neglect this is a positive violation of obligation, and destroys any person's claim to be entitled a Mason." -- [That's from Morris'] Dictionary of Freemasonry, page [number] 325.

"The powers and privileges of the Master of a lodge are by no means limited in extent." -- [That's from Chase's] Digest of Masonic Law, page 380.

"As a presiding officer the Master is possessed of extraordinary powers, which belong to the presiding officer of no other association." -- [That's from] Mackey, Masonic Jurisprudence, page 344.

"The system of Masonic law has little of the republican or democratic spirit about it." [That's from] Morris, Webb's Freemason's Monitor, revised edition, page 195.

"'Once a Mason, always a Mason -- once a Mason everywhere a Mason. However independent wither as individuals or as lodges, whether grand or subordinate -- and we are each and all truly free and uncontrolled by anything save our ancient laws and constitution -- yet no Mason can be a foreigner to another Mason. We are all equal citizens of one common government, having equal rights, equal privileges and equal duties; and in which government, thank God, the majority does not govern. For our order in its very constitution strikes at the root of that which is the very basis of popular government. It proclaims and practices, not that the will of the masses is wise and good, and as such to be obeyed; not that the majority shall govern, but that the law [i.e., above mentioned ancient law] shall govern. Our tenet is not only that no single man but that no body of men (however wise of numerous), can change in any degree one single landmark of our ancient institution. Our law is strictly organic; it cannot be changed without being destroyed. You may take a man to pieces, and you may take a watch to pieces; but you cannot alter his organs and put him together again as you do the time keeper. Masonry is the living man, and all other forms of government mere convenient machines, made by clever mechanics, for regulating the affairs of state. Not only do we know no North, no South, no East and no West, but we know no government save our own. To every government save that of Masonry, and to each and all alike, we are foreigners; and this form of government is neither pontifical, autocratic, monarchial, republican, democratic nor despotic; it is a government per se, and that government is Masonic. We have nothing to do with forms of government, forms of religion, or forms of social life. We are a nation of men only bound to each other by Masonic ties, as citizens of the world, and that world the world of Masonry; brethren to each other all the world over, foreigners to all the world beside.'

"The above is a Masonic address in a nut-shell; it is the compressed essence of Masonic life." -- [It's taken from the] Missouri Grand Lodge Report for 1867.

What a remarkable array of Masonic testimony! And yet the half has not been told. I might go on almost indefinitely showing its foul, treasonable and anti-republican nature, as legibly portrayed under these extracts from standard Masonic publications. The above sentences are complete quotations and not garbled. They are concise and plain. The language is authoritative. Masonic superiors never argue with subordinates. They dictate.

No wonder a most prominent member admits the following: "There is no charge more frequently made against Freemasonry that that of its tendency to revolution and conspiracy, and to political organizations which may affect the peace of society or interfere with the rights of government." [Taken from] Mackey, Mystic Tie of Freemasonry, page 43.

Remember, my friend Dover, that I am not speaking of your nephew's personal views of the supremacy of the lodge, nor saying what he would do if he should find that some of the laws, summons or orders of the lodge should conflict with his duties to the government, but merely showing you what the lodge, according to its standard authors, claims, and what every Mason has sworn to perform. If Mr. Bates should go to congress and then find in some cases that he must violate either his official oath or Masonic Obligation, I do not say which he would consider binding; but I do say, for I know, that the lodge by its writers, its lecturers and its decrees declares that its obligations are supreme, its authority above all civil authority, and obedience to his superiors the first duty of every Mason. If eminent members know and tell the truth about their own order, if Grand Lodge reports can be believed, there can be no doubt on this point. Please read again carefully what these have said, yes, dared to print, and you will see our objection to sending Bates to congress, or electing him or any Mason to any office until he renounces his allegiance to the lodge. Do you think that we demand too much? Every other foreigner, before he is allowed even to vote, must renounce his allegiance to the government under which he was born, and to which perhaps he has never sworn or acknowledged obedience. We require of him, and properly, the following obligation:

"I do declare an oath that it is bona fide my intention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renounce and abjure forever all allegiance and fidelity to all and every foreign prince, potentate, state and sovereign, and particularly [William Cooper: blank, fill in whatever country he came from], of whom I am a subject."

Is it then right for free citizens of this country to vote into any office a person who has sworn and still lives under and acknowledges allegiance to another -- a monarchial and a despotic government? Has not the Grand Lodge of one state, in consistency with the general teaching of Masonry declared that all its members are foreigners to our government? Let us then consider them as such; and our government also should consider them as such, and forbid them to hold office, sit on the jury, or even to vote until they take the oath prescribed for other foreigners.

When I tell you that the "Most Puissant Sovereign Grand Commander of the United States," of whom every Mason in the country is a sworn subject, is an ex-confederate general, whose rebel hands are deeply dyed by the crimson blood of loyal citizens, and who at one battle of the late war led a brigade of Indians against the boys in blue, who, by these cruel savages, were murdered, scalped and mutilated in a manner too barbarous for description, you will see more force in this argument. And why was not the arch traitor, the leader of the rebellion, hung when captured? He and the president of the United States and many congressmen and judges were Royal Arch Masons, and had sworn each to the following:

"Furthermore, do I promise and swear, that I will aid and assist a companion Royal Arch Mason when engaged in any difficulty; and espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, if in my power, whether he be right or wrong."

Is it not reasonable then to suppose that these men, who had sworn to fulfill their duties as civil officers, chose rather to obey Masonic obligations and extricate a rebel from his difficulty? This is the only explanation of this strange event which is worthy of any consideration. And it is made more certain when we remember that, according to Mackey's Jurisprudence, "Treason and rebellion also, because they are altogether political offenses, cannot be inquired into by the lodge."

These facts concerning the oaths and teachings of the lodge will explain many other strange things in the history of our country. They will often explain why some improper person is nominated and elected to some office, or the illegal contestant is given the seat, or a criminal is acquitted or pardoned, and perhaps promoted. Why was our present representative, who you say has not brains enough to be a pettifogging lawyer, and who is notoriously dishonest, sent to congress? Why was he nominated by our party? In answer to this question The Wasp, whose editor is an anti-monopolist, but also inconsistently a Mason, says: "Because, as the superintendent of our main railway told a prominent man before the convention which nominated him, the present incumbent was this company's most available candidate because he was high up in Masonry." Thus he admits that the lodge is used for the purpose of securing improper nominations and electing to office unworthy men, and certainly implies that it is used to control them while in office. So you see our objection to any Mason going to congress, and our only objection to the nomination of Mr. Bates. The one condition on which we will give him our united and hearty support is that he goes before the clerk of the United States Court and takes the oath required of all foreigners, inserting the word Freemasonry in the blank.

I have given you freely and honestly a lengthy statement of this case; but if there is anything further you desire to know I would be glad to answer your inquires. I should be glad to receive a visit from you at any time.


Warren Groves.

N.R. Dover, Princeton.

(end of quote)

Ladies and gentlemen, I hope you understand the import of what I have just read to you, and I hope that you understand that many of the leaders in the patriot community are Freemasons. They are sworn to the order, to their one-world government of which they only are citizens. And they have no allegiance to any other government, organization, oath, creed or their own writings, their own word. Everything that I have quoted that was written in this letter was written or published prior to 1882. The farther back you go in history, the more truth you can read in their words, for they have learned that some of us are smarter than they think. And now, they conveniently delete some of this from their modern writing, but even in their modern writing you can find enough to incriminate and hang them all. The confederate general discussed in this letter by Dr. Groves is none other than Albert Pike.

And to show you that they are everywhere controlling everything and that you are being brainwashed, when is the last time that you really listened to Star Trek? When is the last time you really listened to the message of Star Trek? When is the last time that you understood the people portrayed in Star Trek owned no private property? (laughs) And that everything in that series is Marxism? Pure Socialism, pure and simple. And what is the message of Star Trek? Go rent the movies and the series and watch them, one by one, starting with the Star Trek movie and ending with the last one that was made, and you very quickly come to your senses. Especially when you realize that Captain James T. Kirk, when he came upon the scene, relieved one Captain Albert Pike. The initials of James T. Kirk backwards are K.T.J., the Knights of the Temple of Jerusalem. Lt. Colonel James "Bo" Gritz is a 32nd degree Freemason of the Scottish Rite.

Get your heads out of your collective asses. Good night, and God bless you all.

(closing music: Unknown classical piece - continuation of The Triumphal March?)