Source
Editor:
Time to cut through the bovine excrement. Our “Ministry of Truth” (George Orwell’s “1984”) continues to pump out the propaganda 24/7.
Now we are told Osama bin Laden has been killed and buried at sea. How convenient to disappear the evidence, much as the rubble and debris from the World Trade Center complex were disappeared before a proper investigation.
Let’s get a few things straight. There is much evidence that Osama bin Laden died years ago. He has been kept alive in the imaginations of the American people as the favorite bogeyman who supposedly was behind 9/11 in order to continue the phony war on terrorism. Osama bin Laden was not behind 9/11.
Google “Israel Did 9/11 — All the Proof in the World.” There you will find a mountain of evidence to counter the lies that have been coming from our “Ministry of Truth” for many years now.
Steve Campbell
Glenwood Springs
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Media Lies And Misinformation On Bin Laden
By Stephen Lendman
Rense
5-4-11
Corporate media manipulators love a big story they can hype, distort and falsify to attract large audiences, unaware they're getting managed news, not truth.
Moreover, the bigger the event, the worse the reporting, and no matter how often they're fooled, madding crowds rely on proved unreliable sources like US cable and broadcast TV, as well as corporate broadsheets and popular magazines publishing rubbish not fit to print.
After Obama's May day announcement, round-the-clock coverage now features "story one" ad nauseam, cheerleading the death of a dead man with no one allowed on to refute it.
A previous article did, accessed through the following link:
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2011/05/lies-damn-lies-and-bin-ladens-death.html
Separating fact from fiction, it explained:
(1) Significant facts from David Ray Griffin's important book titled, "Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?" In it, he provided objective and testimonial evidence of his December 2001 death, likely from kidney failure, not a special forces hit squad getting their man then or now.
(2) Forensic evidence that post-9/11 videos and audios were fake.
(3) Bin Laden's role as a CIA asset, as well as called "Enemy Number One," using him advantageously both ways.
(4) Also, reports of his 2001 hospitalizations in Pakistan and Dubai where (in July) the emirate's CIA station chief visited him in his hospital room. Why not if he was a valued asset, his likely status until his natural, not violent, death.
Nonetheless, Western politicians and media, notably America's, never miss a chance to report fiction, not fact, especially on headline news like bin Laden's death, a decade after it happened.
Examples of Media Misreporting
Several May 2 New York Times articles provide painful reading, including Mark Mazzetti, Helene Cooper and Peter Baker's headlined, "Behind the Hunt for Bin Laden," saying:
"For years, the agonizing search for (him) kept coming up empty. Then last July, Pakistanis working for the (CIA) drove up behind a white Suzuki navigating the bustling streets near Peshawar, Pakistan," and discovered, after checking its license, that it belonged to his "most trusted courier...."
Claiming he lead them to bin Laden's location, it said:
"79 American commandos in four helicopters descended on (it). Shots rang out....Of the five dead, one was a tall, bearded man with a bloodied face and a bullet in his head."
Bin Laden's manhunt ended, said the writers, when he was identified, then quickly buried at sea to hide the evidence, though under English common law most often, no body means no killing or crime. In other words, without proof, prosecutorial allegations are baseless.
Nonetheless, Mazzetti, Cooper and Baker recounted a decade-long fantasy, including detainee interrogations in secret Eastern Europe prisons, widespread surveillance, wiretaps, satellite images and more before tracking bin Laden to a Abbottabad, Pakistan compound and killing him.
No matter that none of it was true and much more. International and constitutional law prohibit sending uninvited military forces to another country for any reason.
Moreover, no one suspected of any crime may be summarily executed with no arrest, no due process, no no judicial fairness, and no trial. Just a bullet, bomb or slit throat, Washington's version of summary judgment besides torture and imperial wars as official policies.
These topics were ignored in major media reports, focused solely on killing a decade earlier dead man.
On May 2, Times writers Scott Shane and Robert Worth headlined, "Even Before Al Qaeda Lost Its Founder, It May Have Lost Some of Its Allure," saying:
Bin Laden had "long been removed from managing terrorist operations and whose popularity with Muslims worldwide has plummeted in recent years," calling him a "violent extremis(t) without saying he was replaced after his 2001 death so, of course, his influenced waned. Out of sight, out of mind, especially when dead.
A May 2 Times editorial headlined, "The Long-Awaited News," saying:
"The news that (he'd) been tracked and killed by American forces filled us, and all Americans, with a great sense of relief....(but we must) remember that the fight against extremists is far from over."
Noting years of painstaking "vigilance and persistence," it praised Obama for "show(ing) that he is a strong and measured leader. His declaration on Sunday night that 'justice has been done' was devoid of triumphalism."
In fact, he affirmed continuity of America's war on terror - state terror, including four imperial wars and numerous proxy ones, expending enormous sums while popular needs go begging.
Ignoring truth, he repeated lies endorsed shamelessly by America's media, notably by Times correspondents, op-ed contributors, and editorial writers with comments like:
"Bin Laden's death is an extraordinary moment for Americans and all who have lost loved ones in horrifying, pointless acts of terrorism."
Unmentioned was decades of US and Israeli-sponsored state terrorism responsible for millions of deaths, destruction and human suffering. Earlier, noted scholar/activist Eqbal Ahmad (1934 - 1999) called it:
"illegal violence, (including) torture, (attacking and bombing) villages, destruction of entire peoples, (and) genocide," adding, "Who will define the parameters of terrorism, or decide where terrorists lurk? Why, none other than the United States, (its leading practitioner) which can from the rooftops of the world set out its claim to be the sheriff, judge and hangman, all at one and the same time."
So while rhetorically supporting equal justice and democratic values, Washington spurns international and constitutional law, using brute force to assert might over right, all the while proclaiming just cause reasons for its actions.
No wonder Ahmad called America "a troubled country," sowing "poisonous seeds" globally, saying "(s)ome have ripened and others are ripening (with no) examination of (what they've) sown," adding that "(m)issiles won't solve the problem." In other words, violence assures more of it, but don't expect America's media to explain.
On May 2, Washington Post writers Greg Miller and Joby Warrick headlined, "Bin Laden discovered 'hiding in plain sight,' " recounting the same fantasy as Times writers, saying:
"The commandos swept methodically through (his) compound's main building, clearing one room and then another" until they got their man. Sounding more like bad fiction, they said the operation was secretly planned for months, culminating with Sunday's assault, adding bin Laden wasn't hiding in a cave after all.
A WP editorial headlined, "Possible consequences of the bin Laden coup," saying:
"There are multiple reasons to celebrate" his death, including loss of Al Qaeda's leader, the prowess of US intelligence and military, and that the "prime (9/11) author (finally was) brought to justice."
It brought "a rare moment of common celebration and relief in a divided America. But (it's) not clear to what degree al-Qaeda's operations will be affected by the loss of its leader." It may, in fact, strengthen its resolve. History shows dead militants often inspire followers.
Ignoring illegal operations on foreign soil, it worried most about ending or curtailing them prematurely, no matter the toll in human life and neglect for popular domestic needs. For now, celebratory joy takes precedence, even for false reasons.
A Wall Street Journal editorial headlined "Victory in Abbottabad," saying:
Killing bin Laden "doesn't end the war against Islamic terror (note the racism), but it is a crucial and just victory that is rightfully cause for celebration."
Ignoring daily US war crimes, including killer drones murdering civilians, it railed against "combatants who hide in the world's dark corners, who rarely fight in the open and who attack innocents far from any conventional battlefield."
Praising Obama, it called it "a moment to salute George W. Bush....a vindication of (his war on terror, intelligence, and) interrogation policies," torturing innocent victims to extract false confessions and information about things they know nothing about, including bin Laden's alleged whereabouts.
His death, said the writer, "is a measure of justice for the thousands he killed (and) a warning to others who would kill Americans that they will meet the same fate, no matter how long it takes or where they try to hide."
This and other accounts like it, sadly, is what passes for corporate opinion in America, endorsing state terror and vilifying those against it.
Huffington Post contributor Michael Calderone headlined "Network Anchors Head to Ground Zero for Bin Laden Coverage," saying:
They never miss a chance to misreport major news, including the three broadcast anchors: NBC's Brian Williams, ABC's Diane Sawyer, and CBS' Katie Couric (an entertainer impersonating a newsperson) "host(ing) an expanded, one-hour May 2 edition of their nightly broadcasts from" Ground Zero.
Several cable channels joined them, including CNN and Fox, reporting fiction about a decade earlier dead man.
Time magazine's cover story featured bin Laden's full-page image with a pronounced red X crossing him out, highlighting what didn't happen to the detriment of readers believing inaccurate reporting.
Al Jazeera was just as bad with stories like one headlined, "Obama says world safer without Bin Laden," saying:
He "claimed responsibility for planning the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington," providing no corroborating evidence. In fact, in David Ray Griffin's writings, he said:
"(T)here is no good evidence that bin Laden had planned or even specifically authorized the 9/11 attacks." Those believing it cite his misinterpreted September 2001 Al Jazeera interview, rejoicing in the attacks but denying knowledge or responsibility.
Griffin said one of his aides confirmed that he had "no information or knowledge about the attack(s)" but he "thanked Almighty Allah and bowed before him when he heard this news." Days later he told Al Jazeera:
"I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation."
During two subsequent October 2001 interviews, he praised the "vanguards of Islam (who) destroyed America," but again admitted no knowledge or responsibility.
Al Jazeera now claiming it is a lie.
BBC aired the same misinformation as did America's National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting (PBS), calling his death a blow to Al Qaeda. So did Democracy Now, ignoring bin Laden's decade earlier natural, not violent, death.
Nation magazine editor Katrina vanden Heuvel also swallowed the big lie, headlining her article, "With Osama bin Laden Dead, It's Time to End the 'War on Terror,' " that was entirely bogus from inception, saying:
"Today, President Obama and his team have a chance to reset our fight against terrorism," vanden Heuvel not condemning its lawlessness, America's imperial wars, a president with no credibility, a falsely reported 9/11 event, and that the only relevant terror is what Washington unleashes globally against nonbelligerent nations.
Instead, she praised Obama's "humane and sober" position, calling it "a relief to hear in his words reminders of" a brief post-9/11 period before America went to war in Afghanistan, then Iraq, undertakings Nation magazine supported at the time and still stops short of rejecting.
A Final Comment
On May 2, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting's Peter Hart headlined, "Bush's Palpable Persistence in Pursuit of bin Laden," suggesting he stopped looking, knowing he died, quoting him saying in March 2002:
"Who knows if he's hiding in some cave or not. We haven't heard from him in a long time....I don't know where he is. I really just don't spend that much time on him, to be honest with you."
Washington Monthly's Steve Benen offered more evidence of no interest in pursuing him, saying:
"In July 2006, we learned that the Bush administration closed its unit that had been hunting bin Laden," reported also by New York Times writer Mark Mazzetti on July 4, saying the CIA ceased all efforts last year pursuing him.
Along with David Ray Griffin's important work, it's more proof of bin Laden's 2001 death, putting a lie to Obama's announcement and shameless journalists repeating it.
Rense
5-4-11
Corporate media manipulators love a big story they can hype, distort and falsify to attract large audiences, unaware they're getting managed news, not truth.
Moreover, the bigger the event, the worse the reporting, and no matter how often they're fooled, madding crowds rely on proved unreliable sources like US cable and broadcast TV, as well as corporate broadsheets and popular magazines publishing rubbish not fit to print.
After Obama's May day announcement, round-the-clock coverage now features "story one" ad nauseam, cheerleading the death of a dead man with no one allowed on to refute it.
A previous article did, accessed through the following link:
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2011/05/lies-damn-lies-and-bin-ladens-death.html
Separating fact from fiction, it explained:
(1) Significant facts from David Ray Griffin's important book titled, "Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?" In it, he provided objective and testimonial evidence of his December 2001 death, likely from kidney failure, not a special forces hit squad getting their man then or now.
(2) Forensic evidence that post-9/11 videos and audios were fake.
(3) Bin Laden's role as a CIA asset, as well as called "Enemy Number One," using him advantageously both ways.
(4) Also, reports of his 2001 hospitalizations in Pakistan and Dubai where (in July) the emirate's CIA station chief visited him in his hospital room. Why not if he was a valued asset, his likely status until his natural, not violent, death.
Nonetheless, Western politicians and media, notably America's, never miss a chance to report fiction, not fact, especially on headline news like bin Laden's death, a decade after it happened.
Examples of Media Misreporting
Several May 2 New York Times articles provide painful reading, including Mark Mazzetti, Helene Cooper and Peter Baker's headlined, "Behind the Hunt for Bin Laden," saying:
"For years, the agonizing search for (him) kept coming up empty. Then last July, Pakistanis working for the (CIA) drove up behind a white Suzuki navigating the bustling streets near Peshawar, Pakistan," and discovered, after checking its license, that it belonged to his "most trusted courier...."
Claiming he lead them to bin Laden's location, it said:
"79 American commandos in four helicopters descended on (it). Shots rang out....Of the five dead, one was a tall, bearded man with a bloodied face and a bullet in his head."
Bin Laden's manhunt ended, said the writers, when he was identified, then quickly buried at sea to hide the evidence, though under English common law most often, no body means no killing or crime. In other words, without proof, prosecutorial allegations are baseless.
Nonetheless, Mazzetti, Cooper and Baker recounted a decade-long fantasy, including detainee interrogations in secret Eastern Europe prisons, widespread surveillance, wiretaps, satellite images and more before tracking bin Laden to a Abbottabad, Pakistan compound and killing him.
No matter that none of it was true and much more. International and constitutional law prohibit sending uninvited military forces to another country for any reason.
Moreover, no one suspected of any crime may be summarily executed with no arrest, no due process, no no judicial fairness, and no trial. Just a bullet, bomb or slit throat, Washington's version of summary judgment besides torture and imperial wars as official policies.
These topics were ignored in major media reports, focused solely on killing a decade earlier dead man.
On May 2, Times writers Scott Shane and Robert Worth headlined, "Even Before Al Qaeda Lost Its Founder, It May Have Lost Some of Its Allure," saying:
Bin Laden had "long been removed from managing terrorist operations and whose popularity with Muslims worldwide has plummeted in recent years," calling him a "violent extremis(t) without saying he was replaced after his 2001 death so, of course, his influenced waned. Out of sight, out of mind, especially when dead.
A May 2 Times editorial headlined, "The Long-Awaited News," saying:
"The news that (he'd) been tracked and killed by American forces filled us, and all Americans, with a great sense of relief....(but we must) remember that the fight against extremists is far from over."
Noting years of painstaking "vigilance and persistence," it praised Obama for "show(ing) that he is a strong and measured leader. His declaration on Sunday night that 'justice has been done' was devoid of triumphalism."
In fact, he affirmed continuity of America's war on terror - state terror, including four imperial wars and numerous proxy ones, expending enormous sums while popular needs go begging.
Ignoring truth, he repeated lies endorsed shamelessly by America's media, notably by Times correspondents, op-ed contributors, and editorial writers with comments like:
"Bin Laden's death is an extraordinary moment for Americans and all who have lost loved ones in horrifying, pointless acts of terrorism."
Unmentioned was decades of US and Israeli-sponsored state terrorism responsible for millions of deaths, destruction and human suffering. Earlier, noted scholar/activist Eqbal Ahmad (1934 - 1999) called it:
"illegal violence, (including) torture, (attacking and bombing) villages, destruction of entire peoples, (and) genocide," adding, "Who will define the parameters of terrorism, or decide where terrorists lurk? Why, none other than the United States, (its leading practitioner) which can from the rooftops of the world set out its claim to be the sheriff, judge and hangman, all at one and the same time."
So while rhetorically supporting equal justice and democratic values, Washington spurns international and constitutional law, using brute force to assert might over right, all the while proclaiming just cause reasons for its actions.
No wonder Ahmad called America "a troubled country," sowing "poisonous seeds" globally, saying "(s)ome have ripened and others are ripening (with no) examination of (what they've) sown," adding that "(m)issiles won't solve the problem." In other words, violence assures more of it, but don't expect America's media to explain.
On May 2, Washington Post writers Greg Miller and Joby Warrick headlined, "Bin Laden discovered 'hiding in plain sight,' " recounting the same fantasy as Times writers, saying:
"The commandos swept methodically through (his) compound's main building, clearing one room and then another" until they got their man. Sounding more like bad fiction, they said the operation was secretly planned for months, culminating with Sunday's assault, adding bin Laden wasn't hiding in a cave after all.
A WP editorial headlined, "Possible consequences of the bin Laden coup," saying:
"There are multiple reasons to celebrate" his death, including loss of Al Qaeda's leader, the prowess of US intelligence and military, and that the "prime (9/11) author (finally was) brought to justice."
It brought "a rare moment of common celebration and relief in a divided America. But (it's) not clear to what degree al-Qaeda's operations will be affected by the loss of its leader." It may, in fact, strengthen its resolve. History shows dead militants often inspire followers.
Ignoring illegal operations on foreign soil, it worried most about ending or curtailing them prematurely, no matter the toll in human life and neglect for popular domestic needs. For now, celebratory joy takes precedence, even for false reasons.
A Wall Street Journal editorial headlined "Victory in Abbottabad," saying:
Killing bin Laden "doesn't end the war against Islamic terror (note the racism), but it is a crucial and just victory that is rightfully cause for celebration."
Ignoring daily US war crimes, including killer drones murdering civilians, it railed against "combatants who hide in the world's dark corners, who rarely fight in the open and who attack innocents far from any conventional battlefield."
Praising Obama, it called it "a moment to salute George W. Bush....a vindication of (his war on terror, intelligence, and) interrogation policies," torturing innocent victims to extract false confessions and information about things they know nothing about, including bin Laden's alleged whereabouts.
His death, said the writer, "is a measure of justice for the thousands he killed (and) a warning to others who would kill Americans that they will meet the same fate, no matter how long it takes or where they try to hide."
This and other accounts like it, sadly, is what passes for corporate opinion in America, endorsing state terror and vilifying those against it.
Huffington Post contributor Michael Calderone headlined "Network Anchors Head to Ground Zero for Bin Laden Coverage," saying:
They never miss a chance to misreport major news, including the three broadcast anchors: NBC's Brian Williams, ABC's Diane Sawyer, and CBS' Katie Couric (an entertainer impersonating a newsperson) "host(ing) an expanded, one-hour May 2 edition of their nightly broadcasts from" Ground Zero.
Several cable channels joined them, including CNN and Fox, reporting fiction about a decade earlier dead man.
Time magazine's cover story featured bin Laden's full-page image with a pronounced red X crossing him out, highlighting what didn't happen to the detriment of readers believing inaccurate reporting.
Al Jazeera was just as bad with stories like one headlined, "Obama says world safer without Bin Laden," saying:
He "claimed responsibility for planning the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington," providing no corroborating evidence. In fact, in David Ray Griffin's writings, he said:
"(T)here is no good evidence that bin Laden had planned or even specifically authorized the 9/11 attacks." Those believing it cite his misinterpreted September 2001 Al Jazeera interview, rejoicing in the attacks but denying knowledge or responsibility.
Griffin said one of his aides confirmed that he had "no information or knowledge about the attack(s)" but he "thanked Almighty Allah and bowed before him when he heard this news." Days later he told Al Jazeera:
"I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation."
During two subsequent October 2001 interviews, he praised the "vanguards of Islam (who) destroyed America," but again admitted no knowledge or responsibility.
Al Jazeera now claiming it is a lie.
BBC aired the same misinformation as did America's National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting (PBS), calling his death a blow to Al Qaeda. So did Democracy Now, ignoring bin Laden's decade earlier natural, not violent, death.
Nation magazine editor Katrina vanden Heuvel also swallowed the big lie, headlining her article, "With Osama bin Laden Dead, It's Time to End the 'War on Terror,' " that was entirely bogus from inception, saying:
"Today, President Obama and his team have a chance to reset our fight against terrorism," vanden Heuvel not condemning its lawlessness, America's imperial wars, a president with no credibility, a falsely reported 9/11 event, and that the only relevant terror is what Washington unleashes globally against nonbelligerent nations.
Instead, she praised Obama's "humane and sober" position, calling it "a relief to hear in his words reminders of" a brief post-9/11 period before America went to war in Afghanistan, then Iraq, undertakings Nation magazine supported at the time and still stops short of rejecting.
A Final Comment
On May 2, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting's Peter Hart headlined, "Bush's Palpable Persistence in Pursuit of bin Laden," suggesting he stopped looking, knowing he died, quoting him saying in March 2002:
"Who knows if he's hiding in some cave or not. We haven't heard from him in a long time....I don't know where he is. I really just don't spend that much time on him, to be honest with you."
Washington Monthly's Steve Benen offered more evidence of no interest in pursuing him, saying:
"In July 2006, we learned that the Bush administration closed its unit that had been hunting bin Laden," reported also by New York Times writer Mark Mazzetti on July 4, saying the CIA ceased all efforts last year pursuing him.
Along with David Ray Griffin's important work, it's more proof of bin Laden's 2001 death, putting a lie to Obama's announcement and shameless journalists repeating it.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Ding Dong, The Witch Is Dead
by Pat Anderson
Like everyone else, I’ve been following this bin Laden ruse for the past couple days. People still never cease to amaze me. The same controlled propaganda that sold the story of WMDs in Iraq, the 9/11 OCT, Oswald acted alone, and so on, is being thrown in our faces right now and the sheep eat it up. They whip themselves into a flag waving frenzy when Zionist puppet Barry gets up on the idiot box and declares the latest Satan to be dead. No proof, no evidence, just Barry’s word on it is good enough for these simpletons. Never mind the fact of changing stories. Never mind the fact there is no body. Never mind it’s going to take them just a little while longer to get that corpse photo just right. Just get out there and sing ding dong, the witch is dead. Excuse me for not joining in on the chorus, it’s all bullshit.
I really shouldn’t be surprised. It’s in their nature to want to believe this is the fight for truth, justice, and the American way, even though they have no clue what the fuck that is. I don’t remember where it says in the Constitution it’s perfectly fine to go around executing people with no charges brought against them, no trial by jury. Even in this obviously fake execution of bin Laden, people are out cheering in the streets not thinking about how obviously hypocritical it is. This is how far we have fallen.
Maybe Bush was right when he bitched about the Constitution being just a goddamned piece of paper. It’s obvious to me people have no clue what the document stands for, let alone says. And if they have no clue, how are they going to hold those in government accountable for their actions? They won’t. They’ll just chug along watching American Idol or some other mindless shit on the idiot box until the next important news break claiming some other boogeyman has been killed or some other false flag has been pulled off by the powers that be to get their panties all in a bunch and scream for more blood of the latest patsies. It’s always the same shit on a different day.
I know, I know, I sound quite negative in all this when there are good people out there exposing these obvious lies on a daily basis. I was reading an article earlier on some ZSM media outlet how all the so-called “conspiracy theorists” will jump all over this no matter what is said or what proof is shown by the powers that be. Can you really blame any of us? How many times have you bastards lied to us, stolen from us, just to push your own power hungry agendas? You offer us no substantial proof of anything you claim, only paper thin stories a five year old would be able to punch a thousand holes through. Again, WMDs in Iraq? Where are they? Iran’s nuclear weapons program? Where’s the evidence? Meanwhile, being the hypocrites you are, you turn a blind eye to the false Israel’s nuclear stockpile. As usual, I digress.
So what’s my point with this short rambling article, if we can even call it that? There isn’t one other than to point out things you have most likely already seen and taken note of yourself. The whole thing is a joke and will continue to be one until the sheeple get their heads out of their collective asses and stop falling for the same old shit. Hell, it gets to a point where the whole thing is like one big bad script since it becomes so predictable.
So to those who joined me in not going along with the rest of the herd in the singing of ding dong, the witch is dead, I do commend your intelligence, perseverance, and vigilance. To the rest, keep on sucking at the master’s tit until the milk becomes rotten, just don’t come running to me when it does.
Like everyone else, I’ve been following this bin Laden ruse for the past couple days. People still never cease to amaze me. The same controlled propaganda that sold the story of WMDs in Iraq, the 9/11 OCT, Oswald acted alone, and so on, is being thrown in our faces right now and the sheep eat it up. They whip themselves into a flag waving frenzy when Zionist puppet Barry gets up on the idiot box and declares the latest Satan to be dead. No proof, no evidence, just Barry’s word on it is good enough for these simpletons. Never mind the fact of changing stories. Never mind the fact there is no body. Never mind it’s going to take them just a little while longer to get that corpse photo just right. Just get out there and sing ding dong, the witch is dead. Excuse me for not joining in on the chorus, it’s all bullshit.
I really shouldn’t be surprised. It’s in their nature to want to believe this is the fight for truth, justice, and the American way, even though they have no clue what the fuck that is. I don’t remember where it says in the Constitution it’s perfectly fine to go around executing people with no charges brought against them, no trial by jury. Even in this obviously fake execution of bin Laden, people are out cheering in the streets not thinking about how obviously hypocritical it is. This is how far we have fallen.
Maybe Bush was right when he bitched about the Constitution being just a goddamned piece of paper. It’s obvious to me people have no clue what the document stands for, let alone says. And if they have no clue, how are they going to hold those in government accountable for their actions? They won’t. They’ll just chug along watching American Idol or some other mindless shit on the idiot box until the next important news break claiming some other boogeyman has been killed or some other false flag has been pulled off by the powers that be to get their panties all in a bunch and scream for more blood of the latest patsies. It’s always the same shit on a different day.
I know, I know, I sound quite negative in all this when there are good people out there exposing these obvious lies on a daily basis. I was reading an article earlier on some ZSM media outlet how all the so-called “conspiracy theorists” will jump all over this no matter what is said or what proof is shown by the powers that be. Can you really blame any of us? How many times have you bastards lied to us, stolen from us, just to push your own power hungry agendas? You offer us no substantial proof of anything you claim, only paper thin stories a five year old would be able to punch a thousand holes through. Again, WMDs in Iraq? Where are they? Iran’s nuclear weapons program? Where’s the evidence? Meanwhile, being the hypocrites you are, you turn a blind eye to the false Israel’s nuclear stockpile. As usual, I digress.
So what’s my point with this short rambling article, if we can even call it that? There isn’t one other than to point out things you have most likely already seen and taken note of yourself. The whole thing is a joke and will continue to be one until the sheeple get their heads out of their collective asses and stop falling for the same old shit. Hell, it gets to a point where the whole thing is like one big bad script since it becomes so predictable.
So to those who joined me in not going along with the rest of the herd in the singing of ding dong, the witch is dead, I do commend your intelligence, perseverance, and vigilance. To the rest, keep on sucking at the master’s tit until the milk becomes rotten, just don’t come running to me when it does.
Osama bin Laden's Useful Death
Rense
By Paul Craig Roberts
In a propaganda piece reeking of US Triumphalism, two alleged journalists, Adam Goldman and Chris Brummitt, of the Associated Press or, rather, of the White House Ministry of Truth, write, or copy off a White House or CIA press release that "Osama bin Laden, the terror mastermind killed by Navy SEALs in an intense firefight, was hunted down based on information first gleaned years ago (emphasis added) from detainees at secret CIA prison sites in Eastern Europe, officials disclosed Monday."
How many Americans will notice that the first paragraph of the "report" justifies CIA prisons and torture? Without secret prisons and torture "the terror mastermind" would still be running free, despite having died from renal failure in 2001.
How many Americans will have the wits to wonder why the "terror mastermind" who defeated not merely the CIA and the FBI, but all 16 US intelligence agencies along with Israel's Mossad and the intelligence services of NATO, who defeated NORAD, the National Security Council, the Pentagon and Joint Chiefs of Staff, the US Air Force, and Air Traffic Control, who caused security procedures to fail four times in US airports in one hour on the same day, who caused the state-of-the-art Pentagon air defenses to fail, and who managed to fly three airliners into three buildings with pilots who did not know how to fly has not pulled off any other attack in almost ten years? Do Americans really believe that a government's security system that can so totally fail when confronted with a few Saudi Arabians with box cutters can renew itself to perfection overnight?
How many Americans will notice the resurrection of the long missing bin Laden as "terror mastermind" after his displacement by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Guantanamo prisoner who confessed to being the "mastermind of 9/11" after being water-boarded 183 times?
Americans are too busy celebrating to think, a capability that seems to have been taken out of their education.
Americans are so enthralled over the death of bin Laden that they do not wonder why information gleamed years ago would take so long to locate a person who was allegedly living in a million-dollar building equipped with all the latest communication equipment next to the Pakistani Military Academy. Allegedly, the "most wanted criminal" was not moving from hide-out to hide-out in desolate mountains, but ensconced in luxury quarters in broad daylight. Nevertheless, despite his obvious location, it took the CIA years to find him after claiming to have gained information of his whereabouts out of captives in secret prisons. This is the image of the CIA as the new Keystone Cops.
In an immediate follow-up to the announcement that the Navy SEALs and CIA mercenaries acted in an exemplary fashion following the rules of engagement while a cowardly bin Laden hid behind a woman shield when the gunfire erupted, we have from the pressitutes that "U.S. officials conceded the risk of renewed attack. The terrorists almost certainly will attempt to avenge bin Laden's death, CIA Director Leon Panetta wrote in a memo. . . . Within a few hours, the Department of Homeland Security warned that bin Laden's death was likely to provide motivation for attacks from 'homegrown violent extremists'."
John Brennan, White House counter-terrorism adviser, told reporters that "it was inconceivable that the terrorist fugitive didn't have support in Pakistan where his hideout had been custom built six years ago in a city with a heavy military presence."
So the claimed murder of bin Laden by the US in a sovereign foreign country with which the US is not at war, a crime under international law, has set up three more self-serving possibilities:
Terrorists will avenge bin Laden's death, says the CIA, setting up another false flag attack to keep the profits flowing into the military/security complex and the power flowing into the unaccountable CIA. Homeland Security can extend the domestic police state, abuse of travelers, and arrests of war protestors. And Pakistan is under the gun of invasion and takeover (for India, of course) for shielding bin Laden.
The Israel Lobby's representatives in the US Congress quickly fell in with the agenda. Senator Carl Levin, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, declared that the Pakistani Army and intelligence agency "have a lot of questions to answer, given the location, the length of time and the apparent fact that this was actually this facility was actually build for bin Laden, and its closeness to the central location of the Pakistani army."
The two reporters question nothing in the government's propaganda. Instead, the reporters join in the celebration. Nevertheless they let slip that "officials were weighing the release of at least one photo taken of bin Laden's body as part of what Brennan called an effort to make sure 'nobody has any basis to try and deny the death.'"
As the Guardian and European newspapers have revealed, the photo of the dead bin Laden is a fake. As the alleged body has been dumped into the ocean, nothing remains but the word of the US government, which lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and al Qaeda connections, about yellowcake, about Iranian nukes, and, according to thousands of experts, about 9/11. Suddenly the government is telling us the truth about bin Laden's death? If you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'll let you have for a good price.
My initial interpretation of the faked bin Laden death was that Obama needed closure of the Afghan war and occupation in order to deal with the US budget deficit. Subsequent statements from Obama regime officials suggest that the agenda might be to give Americans a piece of war victory in order to boost their lagging enthusiasm. The military/security complex will become richer and more powerful, and Americans will be rewarded with vicarious pleasure in victory over enemies.
By Paul Craig Roberts
In a propaganda piece reeking of US Triumphalism, two alleged journalists, Adam Goldman and Chris Brummitt, of the Associated Press or, rather, of the White House Ministry of Truth, write, or copy off a White House or CIA press release that "Osama bin Laden, the terror mastermind killed by Navy SEALs in an intense firefight, was hunted down based on information first gleaned years ago (emphasis added) from detainees at secret CIA prison sites in Eastern Europe, officials disclosed Monday."
How many Americans will notice that the first paragraph of the "report" justifies CIA prisons and torture? Without secret prisons and torture "the terror mastermind" would still be running free, despite having died from renal failure in 2001.
How many Americans will have the wits to wonder why the "terror mastermind" who defeated not merely the CIA and the FBI, but all 16 US intelligence agencies along with Israel's Mossad and the intelligence services of NATO, who defeated NORAD, the National Security Council, the Pentagon and Joint Chiefs of Staff, the US Air Force, and Air Traffic Control, who caused security procedures to fail four times in US airports in one hour on the same day, who caused the state-of-the-art Pentagon air defenses to fail, and who managed to fly three airliners into three buildings with pilots who did not know how to fly has not pulled off any other attack in almost ten years? Do Americans really believe that a government's security system that can so totally fail when confronted with a few Saudi Arabians with box cutters can renew itself to perfection overnight?
How many Americans will notice the resurrection of the long missing bin Laden as "terror mastermind" after his displacement by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Guantanamo prisoner who confessed to being the "mastermind of 9/11" after being water-boarded 183 times?
Americans are too busy celebrating to think, a capability that seems to have been taken out of their education.
Americans are so enthralled over the death of bin Laden that they do not wonder why information gleamed years ago would take so long to locate a person who was allegedly living in a million-dollar building equipped with all the latest communication equipment next to the Pakistani Military Academy. Allegedly, the "most wanted criminal" was not moving from hide-out to hide-out in desolate mountains, but ensconced in luxury quarters in broad daylight. Nevertheless, despite his obvious location, it took the CIA years to find him after claiming to have gained information of his whereabouts out of captives in secret prisons. This is the image of the CIA as the new Keystone Cops.
In an immediate follow-up to the announcement that the Navy SEALs and CIA mercenaries acted in an exemplary fashion following the rules of engagement while a cowardly bin Laden hid behind a woman shield when the gunfire erupted, we have from the pressitutes that "U.S. officials conceded the risk of renewed attack. The terrorists almost certainly will attempt to avenge bin Laden's death, CIA Director Leon Panetta wrote in a memo. . . . Within a few hours, the Department of Homeland Security warned that bin Laden's death was likely to provide motivation for attacks from 'homegrown violent extremists'."
John Brennan, White House counter-terrorism adviser, told reporters that "it was inconceivable that the terrorist fugitive didn't have support in Pakistan where his hideout had been custom built six years ago in a city with a heavy military presence."
So the claimed murder of bin Laden by the US in a sovereign foreign country with which the US is not at war, a crime under international law, has set up three more self-serving possibilities:
Terrorists will avenge bin Laden's death, says the CIA, setting up another false flag attack to keep the profits flowing into the military/security complex and the power flowing into the unaccountable CIA. Homeland Security can extend the domestic police state, abuse of travelers, and arrests of war protestors. And Pakistan is under the gun of invasion and takeover (for India, of course) for shielding bin Laden.
The Israel Lobby's representatives in the US Congress quickly fell in with the agenda. Senator Carl Levin, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, declared that the Pakistani Army and intelligence agency "have a lot of questions to answer, given the location, the length of time and the apparent fact that this was actually this facility was actually build for bin Laden, and its closeness to the central location of the Pakistani army."
The two reporters question nothing in the government's propaganda. Instead, the reporters join in the celebration. Nevertheless they let slip that "officials were weighing the release of at least one photo taken of bin Laden's body as part of what Brennan called an effort to make sure 'nobody has any basis to try and deny the death.'"
As the Guardian and European newspapers have revealed, the photo of the dead bin Laden is a fake. As the alleged body has been dumped into the ocean, nothing remains but the word of the US government, which lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and al Qaeda connections, about yellowcake, about Iranian nukes, and, according to thousands of experts, about 9/11. Suddenly the government is telling us the truth about bin Laden's death? If you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'll let you have for a good price.
My initial interpretation of the faked bin Laden death was that Obama needed closure of the Afghan war and occupation in order to deal with the US budget deficit. Subsequent statements from Obama regime officials suggest that the agenda might be to give Americans a piece of war victory in order to boost their lagging enthusiasm. The military/security complex will become richer and more powerful, and Americans will be rewarded with vicarious pleasure in victory over enemies.
Osama bin Laden’s Second Death
Global Research
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
If today were April 1 and not May 2, we could dismiss as an April fool’s joke this morning’s headline that Osama bin Laden was killed in a firefight in Pakistan and quickly buried at sea. As it is, we must take it as more evidence that the US government has unlimited belief in the gullibility of Americans.
Think about it. What are the chances that a person allegedly suffering from kidney disease and requiring dialysis and, in addition, afflicted with diabetes and low blood pressure, survived in mountain hideaways for a decade? If bin Laden was able to acquire dialysis equipment and medical care that his condition required, would not the shipment of dialysis equipment point to his location? Why did it take ten years to find him?
Consider also the claims, repeated by a triumphalist US media celebrating bin Laden’s death, that “bin Laden used his millions to bankroll terrorist training camps in Sudan, the Philippines, and Afghanistan, sending ‘holy warriors’ to foment revolution and fight with fundamentalist Muslim forces across North Africa, in Chechnya, Tajikistan and Bosnia.” That’s a lot of activity for mere millions to bankroll (perhaps the US should have put him in charge of the Pentagon), but the main question is: how was bin Laden able to move his money about? What banking system was helping him? The US government succeeds in seizing the assets of people and of entire countries, Libya being the most recent. Why not bin Laden’s? Was he carrying around with him $100 million dollars in gold coins and sending emissaries to distribute payments to his far-flung operations?
This morning’s headline has the odor of a staged event. The smell reeks from the triumphalist news reports loaded with exaggerations, from celebrants waving flags and chanting “USA USA.” Could something else be going on?
No doubt President Obama is in desperate need of a victory. He committed the fool’s error or restarting the war in Afghanistan, and now after a decade of fighting the US faces stalemate, if not defeat. The wars of the Bush/Obama regimes have bankrupted the US, leaving huge deficits and a declining dollar in their wake. And re-election time is approaching.
The various lies and deceptions, such as “weapons of mass destruction,” of the last several administrations had terrible consequences for the US and the world. But not all deceptions are the same. Remember, the entire reason for invading Afghanistan in the first place was to get bin Laden. Now that President Obama has declared bin Laden to have been shot in the head by US special forces operating in an independent country and buried at sea, there is no reason for continuing the war.
Perhaps the precipitous decline in the US dollar in foreign exchange markets has forced some real budget reductions, which can only come from stopping the open-ended wars. Until the decline of the dollar reached the breaking point, Osama bin Laden, who many experts believe to have been dead for years, was a useful bogyman to use to feed the profits of the US military/security complex.
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
If today were April 1 and not May 2, we could dismiss as an April fool’s joke this morning’s headline that Osama bin Laden was killed in a firefight in Pakistan and quickly buried at sea. As it is, we must take it as more evidence that the US government has unlimited belief in the gullibility of Americans.
Think about it. What are the chances that a person allegedly suffering from kidney disease and requiring dialysis and, in addition, afflicted with diabetes and low blood pressure, survived in mountain hideaways for a decade? If bin Laden was able to acquire dialysis equipment and medical care that his condition required, would not the shipment of dialysis equipment point to his location? Why did it take ten years to find him?
Consider also the claims, repeated by a triumphalist US media celebrating bin Laden’s death, that “bin Laden used his millions to bankroll terrorist training camps in Sudan, the Philippines, and Afghanistan, sending ‘holy warriors’ to foment revolution and fight with fundamentalist Muslim forces across North Africa, in Chechnya, Tajikistan and Bosnia.” That’s a lot of activity for mere millions to bankroll (perhaps the US should have put him in charge of the Pentagon), but the main question is: how was bin Laden able to move his money about? What banking system was helping him? The US government succeeds in seizing the assets of people and of entire countries, Libya being the most recent. Why not bin Laden’s? Was he carrying around with him $100 million dollars in gold coins and sending emissaries to distribute payments to his far-flung operations?
This morning’s headline has the odor of a staged event. The smell reeks from the triumphalist news reports loaded with exaggerations, from celebrants waving flags and chanting “USA USA.” Could something else be going on?
No doubt President Obama is in desperate need of a victory. He committed the fool’s error or restarting the war in Afghanistan, and now after a decade of fighting the US faces stalemate, if not defeat. The wars of the Bush/Obama regimes have bankrupted the US, leaving huge deficits and a declining dollar in their wake. And re-election time is approaching.
The various lies and deceptions, such as “weapons of mass destruction,” of the last several administrations had terrible consequences for the US and the world. But not all deceptions are the same. Remember, the entire reason for invading Afghanistan in the first place was to get bin Laden. Now that President Obama has declared bin Laden to have been shot in the head by US special forces operating in an independent country and buried at sea, there is no reason for continuing the war.
Perhaps the precipitous decline in the US dollar in foreign exchange markets has forced some real budget reductions, which can only come from stopping the open-ended wars. Until the decline of the dollar reached the breaking point, Osama bin Laden, who many experts believe to have been dead for years, was a useful bogyman to use to feed the profits of the US military/security complex.
Monday, May 2, 2011
Osama Bin Laden: Not an Issue
Globalists cartoonishly pull rabbit from hat in desperate act of misdirection.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/
by Tony Cartalucci
Bangkok, Thailand May 2, 2011 - We were knowingly told verified lies to invade and occupy Iraq. We were lied to entirely about the "spontaneous" "Arab Spring" later admitted to by the US State Department as a preplanned operation years in the making. We were knowingly told verified lies regarding Libya to engage in military operations in North Africa and we are currently being told verified lies about US-fueled uprisings in Syria.
Now we are told the notoriously deceptive CIA has "killed" "Osama Bin Laden" in Pakistan. This is the same CIA that planned to create fake videos of Saddam depicting him as a homosexual, and actually did make fake videos of Osama Bin Laden depicting him drinking liquor and consorting with boys. Washington Post's "CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay," stated, "The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from “some of us darker-skinned employees,” he said."
Is there any reason at all for us to suddenly start believing our degenerate criminal government now, in light of their habitual, continuous, murderous campaign of lies and deception directed at both the American people and the world as a whole? The answer is not only unequivocally "no," but we must try to understand why such a "rabbit" has been pulled from the globalists' hat at this point of time. It smacks of almost cartoonish desperation as the US Dollar is crashing and the world's opinion turns sharply against an overtly aggressive NATO carrying out a Hitlerian campaign of military invasion in North Africa.
We must continue to focus on real issues. Not birth certificates of a man who has not made a single decision or spoken a single word of his own since taking office, and not the alleged death of the already long dead Osama Bin Laden who, to this day, has had zero evidence linking him to the attacks of 9/11. 9/11 was an inside job, the subsequent wars were built on a fraudulent foundation of malicious lies - and as Americans celebrate in the streets over the death of this ultimate bogeyman, they seem oblivious to the fact that US air support is aiding and abetting real, admitted terrorists in Libya's east who undeniably have American blood staining their hands.
Let us quickly sweep this stunt under the rug of irrelevancy where it belongs, and continue undermining the efforts of this degenerate empire as we remove and replace their strangling, parasitic tentacles. Let us stand vigilant against false flag attacks fashioned as "acts of retribution" for the now allegedly dead, former CIA agent Osama Bin Laden. It is time Americans seize back their destiny and stop living their lives as a series of knee-jerk reactions to infantile propaganda and the constant parade of manufactured threats brought before us.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/
by Tony Cartalucci
Bangkok, Thailand May 2, 2011 - We were knowingly told verified lies to invade and occupy Iraq. We were lied to entirely about the "spontaneous" "Arab Spring" later admitted to by the US State Department as a preplanned operation years in the making. We were knowingly told verified lies regarding Libya to engage in military operations in North Africa and we are currently being told verified lies about US-fueled uprisings in Syria.
Now we are told the notoriously deceptive CIA has "killed" "Osama Bin Laden" in Pakistan. This is the same CIA that planned to create fake videos of Saddam depicting him as a homosexual, and actually did make fake videos of Osama Bin Laden depicting him drinking liquor and consorting with boys. Washington Post's "CIA unit's wacky idea: Depict Saddam as gay," stated, "The agency actually did make a video purporting to show Osama bin Laden and his cronies sitting around a campfire swigging bottles of liquor and savoring their conquests with boys, one of the former CIA officers recalled, chuckling at the memory. The actors were drawn from “some of us darker-skinned employees,” he said."
Is there any reason at all for us to suddenly start believing our degenerate criminal government now, in light of their habitual, continuous, murderous campaign of lies and deception directed at both the American people and the world as a whole? The answer is not only unequivocally "no," but we must try to understand why such a "rabbit" has been pulled from the globalists' hat at this point of time. It smacks of almost cartoonish desperation as the US Dollar is crashing and the world's opinion turns sharply against an overtly aggressive NATO carrying out a Hitlerian campaign of military invasion in North Africa.
We must continue to focus on real issues. Not birth certificates of a man who has not made a single decision or spoken a single word of his own since taking office, and not the alleged death of the already long dead Osama Bin Laden who, to this day, has had zero evidence linking him to the attacks of 9/11. 9/11 was an inside job, the subsequent wars were built on a fraudulent foundation of malicious lies - and as Americans celebrate in the streets over the death of this ultimate bogeyman, they seem oblivious to the fact that US air support is aiding and abetting real, admitted terrorists in Libya's east who undeniably have American blood staining their hands.
Let us quickly sweep this stunt under the rug of irrelevancy where it belongs, and continue undermining the efforts of this degenerate empire as we remove and replace their strangling, parasitic tentacles. Let us stand vigilant against false flag attacks fashioned as "acts of retribution" for the now allegedly dead, former CIA agent Osama Bin Laden. It is time Americans seize back their destiny and stop living their lives as a series of knee-jerk reactions to infantile propaganda and the constant parade of manufactured threats brought before us.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
H.G. Wells: Prophet of the NWO
by Fritz Springmeier
(for henrymakow.com)
Is there any proof that events in the world are following a script? The question has intrigued me because many people with inside knowledge have told me of attending meetings where the script of the future was outlined, 200-yr. plans, 40-year plans, 20, 10, and 5-year plans.
The futuristic predictions of H.G. Wells (a socialist Masonic Prophet) prove that indeed much more is contrived than the man in the street could imagine.
Written in 1913, Well's The World Set Free predicted the use of atom bombs and the effect of nuclear war long before scientists considered the possibility. It also predicted the breakthrough in 1933, when the details of nuclear chain reaction were discovered.
In other books, Wells said a NWO would come about by the elite controlling the air and sea lanes, as well as energy production, which indeed they have done. Another incredible visionary idea was the concept of air superiority. Whoever gains control of the air will consistently win the ground battle. This has been shown since W.W. I, but it was not realized when H.G. Wells conceived it, and it has taken many years for people to accept the idea.
Not only did H.G. Wells predict modern warfare, the bombing of London, atom bombs, the League of Nations, stealth fighters over Iraq, space flight and countless other details of the future, far in advance of their eventual happening, as well as mapping out in detail how a New World Order could be created, but he participated in causing events to take place.
He was a major player to create the League of Nations. When the Russian Revolution occurred, H.G. Wells (who was known simply as H.G.) went to Russia to trade ideas with Lenin on how to follow up the Revolution to create a New World Order. They disagreed, and parted disliking each other. (The disagreement stemmed over H.G.'s vision that the elite families through business and technology would create the New Order. Lenin wanted to socialize things directly through strong government.)
Much later in 1934, H.G. visited personally with FDR in the U.S. and Stalin in Moscow. (By the way, all three were Freemasons.) After visiting with FDR, H.G. declared that the "United States...[was] the most effective transmitting instrument possible for the coming of the new world order."
He felt that FDR was incorporating H.G.'s Open Conspiracy ideas for bringing in the NWO that H.G. had been advocating, for instance, FDR's brain trust, technocratic string pullers like Felix Frankfurter and Raymond Moley, who made policy for FDR.
After his meeting with Stalin, he described Stalin, "I have never met a man more candid, fair and honest...and to nothing occult and sinister...everyone trusts him." Over the years, he advocated the U.K. help the U.S.S.R.
Readers may realize from this that the U.S., the U.S.S.R. and the U.K. have all been guided toward the same goal, but have been taking different paths. In general, H.G. was a guru to his generation, and after his death a society in his name continued promoting his views.
While he networked with countless persons around the world directly promoting his views (which obviously lined up with "The Plan"), his books quietly served a more subtle but important role.
The reader may have observed the following about human nature....when first confronted with something true but strange, the mind rejects it as ridiculously crazy. The second time it is heard it is merely rejected, and often the third time the truth confronts them the person will say "I knew that" as if the item were self-evident.
Now look at the titles of his books "Anticipation" and "Things to Come" and the way they were written, and it is evident that he is psychologically conditioning the public to accept the stages of the New World Order as if they were self-evident.
He was a master at this. And indeed, when I hear the elite today I hear echoes of H.G. Well's ideas. For instance, David Rockefeller at the 1991 Bilderberger meeting, "...the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity."
Contrary to the assumptions of many readers of Aldous Huxley, Orson Wells and H.G. Wells, these authors were not opposed to their prophetic views of Big Brother's One World Dictatorship. H.G. strongly believed in racial eugenics to kill the inferior races and useless eaters. He believed the state should educate people and control their minds to obediently serve the state. He believed in social engineering. He was opposed to Christians being allowed to teach their children about God, and religious toleration.
If you were an Illuminati insider, like the late Masonic prophet Manly P. Hall, who served as a Grand Master in both the Illuminati and Freemasonry, you would understand the esoteric reference that H.G. made in A Modern Utopia, p. 67, that the Air Dictatorship's NWO would be "Bacon's visionary House of Salomon".
This statement alone links H.G.'s thinking with the Illuminati's occult plans. It shows H.G. was an insider with knowledge of the plans. Of course, along with inside knowledge, H.G. contained an intense intellectual curiosity, a keen comprehensive brain, great willpower, and a disdain for the common man and the Christian God. He revealed in The Invisible King (1917) that his deity was "a personification of...the five year plan".
READING FROM THE SCRIPT?
Was Wells merely predicting or was he helping to shape and create a NWO? There is no doubt that he was a major player to create it. His ideas have been used as a guide, although it could be postulated that his ideas are copied from a master plan that remains hidden from view. The powers that be have intentionally manipulated the crime rate in line with Wells' prediction that a police state would grow in response to the growing crime threat. The war on terror is a development in line with this. Obviously H.G.'s writings were a blueprint to create, and not mere idle reflections of an intelligent curious man.
Born in 1866, Wells wrote a series of books that spell out how the coming New World Order would come about. In 1895, he came out with The Time Machine (sci-fi) and he continued writing and publishing until 1945, with for instance, The Happy Turning: A Dream of Life, which makes references to the futuristic dreams he had including walking with Jesus, who in H.G.'s repeating dreams was also disappointed in humanity for its stupidity and indifference.
One of the concepts of Wells' "Open Conspiracy" was that many people worldwide would openly contribute to the creation of the NWO. This parallels another occult prophet Alice Bailey and her ideas in Externalization of the Hierarchy, where she predicts that things done in secret in the occult world would be mainstreamed to bring in the New World Order.
For those familiar with how the Illuminati have set up groups like the CFR and TLC will take note that H.G. was RIIA (Royal Institute for International Affairs) which was the British equivalent to the CFR. The RIIA's first president was Waldorf Astor. As I pointed out in my Be Wise As Serpents (1991) these organizations also add on a few individual members who are not Illuminati for window dressing, so membership doesn't equate with a membership in the ultimate secret society, but it certainly indicates a person in the middle of what they are doing.
Edith Star Miller in Occult Theocracy (posthumously in 1933) does a good job of linking the plethora of organizations that the occult hierarchy breed to carry out their program, and the Fabian Society was one of them. H.G. was an active member of the Fabian Society, but his views were controversial with most of its members, but this does again show his active participation in The Plan.
The Webbs, leaders of the Fabian Society, also under Lord Robert Cecil's (Br. Intelligence) direction, organized the Cliveden Set and a group called the Coefficients. The Coefficients later became the Round Table. H.G. was part of the Coefficients, which included such personages as Sir Edward Grey, Bertrand Russell, and Cecil's cousin Lord Arthur Balfour. (By the way, names which appear in my Bloodlines of the Illuminati (1995) book.)
SON OF A SERVANT, HE SERVED THE ELITE
Now bear in mind, H.G. was born to a servant, granted-- a head servant, of the British elite, and here he is rubbing shoulders with the Illuminati aristocratic elite. Also bear in mind that H.G. despised the lower classes and promoted the idea that the elite's big businesses would lead us into the New World Order along with technology and technocrats that run that technology.
H.G.'s ideas on the power of technology and technocrats to create a NWO spawned an entire movement in that direction. It is beyond the scope of this short article to go into that, but the use of technology, especially in the ways H.G. outlined has indeed been achieved.
I knew in 1991, when I was the first to identify H.G. as a Freemason that it could lead to controversy, because the Mason's Lodges had not publicly recognized him being a member.
There are a certain set of members whose membership they perpetually keep quiet about. I based my assertion that he was a Freemason on my back issues of the Scottish Rite's New Age magazine that I had been fortunate to buy going back to almost WW I.
These magazines treated him like they did members, as well as referring to him as a "masonic prophet". On the other side of things, H.G. in his books/movies makes references to Freemasonry and uses Masonic imagery/symbols.
Particularly of note, is his reference in his short story "The Inexperienced Ghost" to the Masonic Lodge of Research, the Quatuor Coronati Lodge 2076. His character says, "Now, Sanderson is a Freemason, a member of the Lodge of the Four Kings, which devotes itself so ably to the study and elucidation of all the mysteries of Masonry past and present." (The Complete Short Stories of H.G. Wells, pp. 909-910) That H.G. carried so much clout with Freemasons around the globe also speaks something.
The occult symbol of the Winged Globe, a symbol often used by Freemason Charles Taze Russell (founder of the J.W.'s Watchtower Society), was to become the symbol of the NWO in the book/movie The Shape of Things to Come. Read my books Be Wise As Serpents (1991) available in a pirated version on the Internet) and The Watchtower & the Masons (1990) to explore all the numerous links between all of these things. Also noteworthy is H.G.'s close association with the Huxley's who were Freemasons. Freemason T.H. Huxley (a Fellow of the Royal Society at 26!) mentored Wells, and stressed the idea of a Scientific Dictatorship which H.G. was able to promote to the extent it became a popular movement.
H.G. Wells had a belief in himself and a vibrancy that made his ideas and himself attractive. He was skilled with the pen, but a poor speaker. He had affairs with a constant stream of interested woman, who he emotionally scarred in short order. He placed importance on friends, such as the international author Joseph Conrad, but the women he conquered were simply sexual objects to him. In this the reader sees he had inconsistencies, in this example, that his rhetoric about women's rights was a cause but not a personal life style. He got his big break in life when William Ernest Henley believed in his abilities and in 1895 helped his launch his sci-fi writing career. Two books that had a big influence on Wells as a boy writer were Plato's Republic and Jonathan Swift's satire Gulliver's Travels.
Wells shows us that decision-makers are indeed guided by detailed futuristic plans. H.G. Wells was at the center of what the Illuminati were doing to create the stages of development towards a One World Government. That he believed in what he was doing, there is no question. His possible occult activities, if they took place, have been well hidden. He was a practical intellectual whose writings have changed our world.
(for henrymakow.com)
Is there any proof that events in the world are following a script? The question has intrigued me because many people with inside knowledge have told me of attending meetings where the script of the future was outlined, 200-yr. plans, 40-year plans, 20, 10, and 5-year plans.
The futuristic predictions of H.G. Wells (a socialist Masonic Prophet) prove that indeed much more is contrived than the man in the street could imagine.
Written in 1913, Well's The World Set Free predicted the use of atom bombs and the effect of nuclear war long before scientists considered the possibility. It also predicted the breakthrough in 1933, when the details of nuclear chain reaction were discovered.
In other books, Wells said a NWO would come about by the elite controlling the air and sea lanes, as well as energy production, which indeed they have done. Another incredible visionary idea was the concept of air superiority. Whoever gains control of the air will consistently win the ground battle. This has been shown since W.W. I, but it was not realized when H.G. Wells conceived it, and it has taken many years for people to accept the idea.
Not only did H.G. Wells predict modern warfare, the bombing of London, atom bombs, the League of Nations, stealth fighters over Iraq, space flight and countless other details of the future, far in advance of their eventual happening, as well as mapping out in detail how a New World Order could be created, but he participated in causing events to take place.
He was a major player to create the League of Nations. When the Russian Revolution occurred, H.G. Wells (who was known simply as H.G.) went to Russia to trade ideas with Lenin on how to follow up the Revolution to create a New World Order. They disagreed, and parted disliking each other. (The disagreement stemmed over H.G.'s vision that the elite families through business and technology would create the New Order. Lenin wanted to socialize things directly through strong government.)
Much later in 1934, H.G. visited personally with FDR in the U.S. and Stalin in Moscow. (By the way, all three were Freemasons.) After visiting with FDR, H.G. declared that the "United States...[was] the most effective transmitting instrument possible for the coming of the new world order."
He felt that FDR was incorporating H.G.'s Open Conspiracy ideas for bringing in the NWO that H.G. had been advocating, for instance, FDR's brain trust, technocratic string pullers like Felix Frankfurter and Raymond Moley, who made policy for FDR.
After his meeting with Stalin, he described Stalin, "I have never met a man more candid, fair and honest...and to nothing occult and sinister...everyone trusts him." Over the years, he advocated the U.K. help the U.S.S.R.
Readers may realize from this that the U.S., the U.S.S.R. and the U.K. have all been guided toward the same goal, but have been taking different paths. In general, H.G. was a guru to his generation, and after his death a society in his name continued promoting his views.
While he networked with countless persons around the world directly promoting his views (which obviously lined up with "The Plan"), his books quietly served a more subtle but important role.
The reader may have observed the following about human nature....when first confronted with something true but strange, the mind rejects it as ridiculously crazy. The second time it is heard it is merely rejected, and often the third time the truth confronts them the person will say "I knew that" as if the item were self-evident.
Now look at the titles of his books "Anticipation" and "Things to Come" and the way they were written, and it is evident that he is psychologically conditioning the public to accept the stages of the New World Order as if they were self-evident.
He was a master at this. And indeed, when I hear the elite today I hear echoes of H.G. Well's ideas. For instance, David Rockefeller at the 1991 Bilderberger meeting, "...the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity."
Contrary to the assumptions of many readers of Aldous Huxley, Orson Wells and H.G. Wells, these authors were not opposed to their prophetic views of Big Brother's One World Dictatorship. H.G. strongly believed in racial eugenics to kill the inferior races and useless eaters. He believed the state should educate people and control their minds to obediently serve the state. He believed in social engineering. He was opposed to Christians being allowed to teach their children about God, and religious toleration.
If you were an Illuminati insider, like the late Masonic prophet Manly P. Hall, who served as a Grand Master in both the Illuminati and Freemasonry, you would understand the esoteric reference that H.G. made in A Modern Utopia, p. 67, that the Air Dictatorship's NWO would be "Bacon's visionary House of Salomon".
This statement alone links H.G.'s thinking with the Illuminati's occult plans. It shows H.G. was an insider with knowledge of the plans. Of course, along with inside knowledge, H.G. contained an intense intellectual curiosity, a keen comprehensive brain, great willpower, and a disdain for the common man and the Christian God. He revealed in The Invisible King (1917) that his deity was "a personification of...the five year plan".
READING FROM THE SCRIPT?
Was Wells merely predicting or was he helping to shape and create a NWO? There is no doubt that he was a major player to create it. His ideas have been used as a guide, although it could be postulated that his ideas are copied from a master plan that remains hidden from view. The powers that be have intentionally manipulated the crime rate in line with Wells' prediction that a police state would grow in response to the growing crime threat. The war on terror is a development in line with this. Obviously H.G.'s writings were a blueprint to create, and not mere idle reflections of an intelligent curious man.
Born in 1866, Wells wrote a series of books that spell out how the coming New World Order would come about. In 1895, he came out with The Time Machine (sci-fi) and he continued writing and publishing until 1945, with for instance, The Happy Turning: A Dream of Life, which makes references to the futuristic dreams he had including walking with Jesus, who in H.G.'s repeating dreams was also disappointed in humanity for its stupidity and indifference.
One of the concepts of Wells' "Open Conspiracy" was that many people worldwide would openly contribute to the creation of the NWO. This parallels another occult prophet Alice Bailey and her ideas in Externalization of the Hierarchy, where she predicts that things done in secret in the occult world would be mainstreamed to bring in the New World Order.
For those familiar with how the Illuminati have set up groups like the CFR and TLC will take note that H.G. was RIIA (Royal Institute for International Affairs) which was the British equivalent to the CFR. The RIIA's first president was Waldorf Astor. As I pointed out in my Be Wise As Serpents (1991) these organizations also add on a few individual members who are not Illuminati for window dressing, so membership doesn't equate with a membership in the ultimate secret society, but it certainly indicates a person in the middle of what they are doing.
Edith Star Miller in Occult Theocracy (posthumously in 1933) does a good job of linking the plethora of organizations that the occult hierarchy breed to carry out their program, and the Fabian Society was one of them. H.G. was an active member of the Fabian Society, but his views were controversial with most of its members, but this does again show his active participation in The Plan.
The Webbs, leaders of the Fabian Society, also under Lord Robert Cecil's (Br. Intelligence) direction, organized the Cliveden Set and a group called the Coefficients. The Coefficients later became the Round Table. H.G. was part of the Coefficients, which included such personages as Sir Edward Grey, Bertrand Russell, and Cecil's cousin Lord Arthur Balfour. (By the way, names which appear in my Bloodlines of the Illuminati (1995) book.)
SON OF A SERVANT, HE SERVED THE ELITE
Now bear in mind, H.G. was born to a servant, granted-- a head servant, of the British elite, and here he is rubbing shoulders with the Illuminati aristocratic elite. Also bear in mind that H.G. despised the lower classes and promoted the idea that the elite's big businesses would lead us into the New World Order along with technology and technocrats that run that technology.
H.G.'s ideas on the power of technology and technocrats to create a NWO spawned an entire movement in that direction. It is beyond the scope of this short article to go into that, but the use of technology, especially in the ways H.G. outlined has indeed been achieved.
I knew in 1991, when I was the first to identify H.G. as a Freemason that it could lead to controversy, because the Mason's Lodges had not publicly recognized him being a member.
There are a certain set of members whose membership they perpetually keep quiet about. I based my assertion that he was a Freemason on my back issues of the Scottish Rite's New Age magazine that I had been fortunate to buy going back to almost WW I.
These magazines treated him like they did members, as well as referring to him as a "masonic prophet". On the other side of things, H.G. in his books/movies makes references to Freemasonry and uses Masonic imagery/symbols.
Particularly of note, is his reference in his short story "The Inexperienced Ghost" to the Masonic Lodge of Research, the Quatuor Coronati Lodge 2076. His character says, "Now, Sanderson is a Freemason, a member of the Lodge of the Four Kings, which devotes itself so ably to the study and elucidation of all the mysteries of Masonry past and present." (The Complete Short Stories of H.G. Wells, pp. 909-910) That H.G. carried so much clout with Freemasons around the globe also speaks something.
The occult symbol of the Winged Globe, a symbol often used by Freemason Charles Taze Russell (founder of the J.W.'s Watchtower Society), was to become the symbol of the NWO in the book/movie The Shape of Things to Come. Read my books Be Wise As Serpents (1991) available in a pirated version on the Internet) and The Watchtower & the Masons (1990) to explore all the numerous links between all of these things. Also noteworthy is H.G.'s close association with the Huxley's who were Freemasons. Freemason T.H. Huxley (a Fellow of the Royal Society at 26!) mentored Wells, and stressed the idea of a Scientific Dictatorship which H.G. was able to promote to the extent it became a popular movement.
H.G. Wells had a belief in himself and a vibrancy that made his ideas and himself attractive. He was skilled with the pen, but a poor speaker. He had affairs with a constant stream of interested woman, who he emotionally scarred in short order. He placed importance on friends, such as the international author Joseph Conrad, but the women he conquered were simply sexual objects to him. In this the reader sees he had inconsistencies, in this example, that his rhetoric about women's rights was a cause but not a personal life style. He got his big break in life when William Ernest Henley believed in his abilities and in 1895 helped his launch his sci-fi writing career. Two books that had a big influence on Wells as a boy writer were Plato's Republic and Jonathan Swift's satire Gulliver's Travels.
Wells shows us that decision-makers are indeed guided by detailed futuristic plans. H.G. Wells was at the center of what the Illuminati were doing to create the stages of development towards a One World Government. That he believed in what he was doing, there is no question. His possible occult activities, if they took place, have been well hidden. He was a practical intellectual whose writings have changed our world.